Every category where a model named LexisNexis Risk Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	0%	23 of 108	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LexisNexis Risk Solutions yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LexisNexis Risk Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase10 labels2

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LexisNexis Risk Solutions - Category Leader (best-in-class in data/system integration and platform/case management).” Grok 4.1 Fast · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · first choice

“LexisNexis Risk Solutions if your compliance needs are more complex or multi-jurisdictional” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For high-volume identity/risk screening: LexisNexis Risk Solutions.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“It is one of the best-integrated KYC options.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LexisNexis Risk Solutions, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LexisNexis Risk Solutions was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

NICE Actimize24 of 326Not among the top eight

ComplyAdvantage16 of 322Not among the top eight

Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management12 of 322Not among the top eight

SAS9 of 320Not among the top eight

SAS Anti-Money Laundering8 of 323Not among the top eight

Quantexa8 of 320Not among the top eight

Unit217 of 322Not among the top eight

Alessa7 of 320Not among the top eight

Feedzai7 of 320Not among the top eight

Hawk AI6 of 320Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LexisNexis Risk Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named LexisNexis Risk Solutions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fraud.net24

ondato.com15

g2.com11

sphinxhq.com11

bureau.id10

fraudio.com10

gartner.com10

riskpublishing.com10

learn.g2.com9

amlwatcher.com8

118 of the 118 domain citations in answers naming LexisNexis Risk Solutions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

ondato.com/blog/best-aml-software15

fraud.net/resources/top-aml-software11

bureau.id/resources/blog/transaction-monitoring-software10

riskpublishing.com/best-anti-money-laundering-aml-software-compa10

sphinxhq.com/blog-posts/best-aml-software10

fraud.net/resources/aml-transaction-monitoring-software8

fraud.net/resources/best-aml-compliance-software8

fraud.net/resources/top-kyc-and-aml-solutions-for-businesses8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

lexisnexis.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LexisNexis Risk Solutions takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 9,900 a month (“lexisnexis risk solutions”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 177 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 951,707 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 63,270 · 5,600 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 54,450
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $107 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

55+ ads · 37 text, 15 image, 3 video · 55 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as RELX INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 21 in the year, 34 before. 65 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 108 in AML monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ComplyAdvantage

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on lexisnexis.com

10,007

subdomains included

Content

4,987

counted in the table below

Documentation

112

Product · Integration

1,160 · 6

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,936	1	2026-08-28
News or press	1,239	0	2022-03-30
Report or ebook	548	0	2023-02-14
Glossary or explainer	378	undated
Webinar or virtual event	314	0	2024-08-29
Case study	244	0	2026-06-11
Podcast or video	240	undated
Template or tool	39	0	2026-06-08
Comparison	25	3	2026-09-29
Conference or event	24	0	2025-09-03

Most recent

2026-09-29Lexis ai vs chatgpt comparison
2026-08-28Untaxed at marriage taxed at divorce who pays when a cross border joint venture ends blog
2026-07-08Idverse deepfake presentation vs injection attacks comparison
2026-07-08Idverse deepfake presentation vs injection attacks comparison
2026-06-11Weworld sanctions screening compliance case study
2026-06-11Weworld sanctions screening compliance case study

Events in person

Last twelve months

November 4, 2025LexCon GrazSchubert Kino, Graz, Österreich · took part
November 3, 2025LexCon SalzburgMozartkino, Salzburg, Österreich · took part
October 21, 2025LexCon InnsbruckMetropol Kino, Innsbruck, Österreich · took part

As the event pages on lexisnexis.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page lexisnexis.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as LexisNexis Risk Solutions

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LexisNexis Risk Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.

LexisNexis 2

Follow LexisNexis Risk Solutions

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LexisNexis Risk Solutions is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: For companies and government agencies seeking data analytics supporting compliance, customer acquisition, fraud detection, health outcomes, identity solutions, investigation, receivables management, risk decisioning and workflow optimization.
lexisnexis.com
For: companies and government agencies
lexisnexis.com
Price stated: Pricing varies by plan lexisnexis.com/en-ae/compliance/nexis-diligence/pricing
Free plan or trial: Yes. You can request a trial of Nexis Diligence+ lexisnexis.com/en-ae/compliance/nexis-diligence/pricing
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2SOC 2 Type 1SOC 3ISO 14001:2015CCPAGDPRHIPAAISO/IEC 27001
Customers named: Harper MacleodIrwin Mitchell Solicitors
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, hosting

What LexisNexis Risk Solutions's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: lexisnexis.com, lexisnexis.com/en-ae/compliance/nexis-diligence/pricing, trust.lexisnexis.com, lexisnexis.com/en-sg/products/PSL, lexisnexis.com/en-hk/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LexisNexis Risk Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LexisNexis Risk Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LexisNexis Risk Solutions by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where LexisNexis Risk Solutions is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name LexisNexis Risk Solutions, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.