Every category where a model named Disputifier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	10%	4 of 81	8%	12	accepted challenger
Ecommerce fraud prevention	Receivables and billing	0%	54 of 70	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by SEON at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Disputifier yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Disputifier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels8

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Disputifier offers a transparent pricing model where you only pay when funds are successfully recovered, ensuring a guaranteed ROI.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Chargeback management · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose Chargeflow or Disputifier if you want automated dispute resolution with no budget risk” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Chargeback management · budget prompt · first choice

“the best choice is usually Disputifier if your priority is a lower-cost, pay-for-success model” Perplexity Sonar · Chargeback management · budget prompt · first choice

“Chargeflow or Disputifier are usually the cheapest to start because there is no monthly minimum” Muse Glimmer 30B · Chargeback management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“smaller users report complexity, high minimums, or overkill features” Grok 4.1 Fast · Chargeback management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Disputifier, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Disputifier was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chargeflow29 of 329Compare →

Chargeblast17 of 322Compare →

Chargebacks91113 of 321Compare →

Justt10 of 320Compare →

Signifyd9 of 320Not among the top eight

Kount7 of 320Not among the top eight

Stripe Radar5 of 321Not among the top eight

Midigator4 of 321Compare →

ChargeSentry4 of 320Not among the top eight

Chargeback.io4 of 320Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Disputifier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named Disputifier and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chargeflow.io25

chargeback.io22

guideflow.com20

beastinsights.com17

softwareadvice.com16

getapp.com12

stripe.com10

chargeblast.com9

claimlane.com9

disputifier.comYour site9

140 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming Disputifier came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

chargeback.io/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software20

guideflow.com/blog/chargeback-management-software19

beastinsights.com/best/chargeback-management-software17

softwareadvice.com/category/4793-chargeback-management16

getapp.com/all-software/chargeback-management12

chargeflow.io/chargebacks-101/chargeback-solutions11

claimlane.com/resources/blog/chargeback-management-software9

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-chargeback-protection-service9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

disputifier.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Disputifier takes 10% of first choices and Chargeflow takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “chargeback management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “chargeback management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“disputifier”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,673 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 535 · 6 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 680
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

9 ads · 9 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2024, as Disputifier, LLC, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

10%

rank 4 of 81 in chargeback management

Segment leader

24%

Chargeflow

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 32 answers
Its own site cited: in 32 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on disputifier.com

282

subdomains included

Content

233

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	187	undated	Chargeback management, Ecommerce fraud
Comparison	29	undated	Chargeback management
Glossary or explainer	16	undated
Template or tool	1	undated	Chargeback management

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page disputifier.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Disputifier

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Disputifier is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: the smartest, merchant-friendly, full-service chargeback platform
disputifier.com
For: ecommerce merchants and ISOs
disputifier.com
Price stated: Pricing is based on the services selected. We charge no monthly fees, setup fees, or subscription fees. Simply pay when we help you stop or win a chargeback. disputifier.com
Starting price: $0.05/ per order disputifier.com/pricing
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Disputifier's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: disputifier.com, disputifier.com/pricing, trust.disputifier.com, disputifier.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Disputifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Disputifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Disputifier by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Disputifier is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Disputifier, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.