Every category where a model named Justt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	6%	5 of 81	12%	24	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Justt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Justt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	2	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	0	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	0	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	3	1	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels4

Paraphrase5 labels2

Comparative28 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Justt positions itself specifically for subscription and SaaS businesses... Best for Specialized SaaS & Subscription Defense” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Chargeback management · direct prompt · first choice

“Justt - if your primary need is chargeback/dispute response management and you want AI automation to reduce manual work” MiniMax M2.5 · Chargeback management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd shortlist Justt for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · Chargeback management · direct prompt · first choice

“Justt suits ops teams who want machine-learning, exportable representment evidence tied to dispute recovery” Muse Glimmer 30B · Chargeback management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be very cautious. ... A fully managed service like Chargeflow or Justt can pay for itself — but only if you negotiate a success-based fee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Chargeback management · negative prompt · soft negative

“There's a cold-start problem where the first three months don't achieve the win rate the sales team quotes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Chargeback management · negative prompt · soft negative

“these tools less relevant” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Chargeback management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Justt, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Justt was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chargeflow60 of 6813Compare →

Chargebacks91154 of 6812Compare →

Midigator30 of 684Compare →

Kount23 of 680Not among the top eight

Signifyd21 of 680Not among the top eight

Verifi18 of 680Not among the top eight

Chargeblast17 of 683Compare →

Ethoca17 of 680Not among the top eight

Sift15 of 681Not among the top eight

Disputifier10 of 682Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Justt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 68 answers that named Justt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chargeflow.io42

guideflow.com35

chargeback.io30

fintechspecs.com28

fraud.net28

beastinsights.com24

chargebackstop.com21

g2.com21

gitnux.org21

getapp.com20

270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Justt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/chargeback-management-software33

fintechspecs.com/blog/best-chargeback-management-tools-saas28

beastinsights.com/best/chargeback-management-software23

chargeback.io/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software22

fraud.net/resources/best-chargeback-prevention-software22

chargebackstop.com/chargeback-management-software21

shopiator.com/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software20

chargeflow.io/chargebacks-101/chargeback-solutions19

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

justt.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Justt takes 6% of first choices and Chargeflow takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “chargeback management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “chargeback management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“justt”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 2 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,068 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,833 · 98 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,167
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $2,094 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36 ads · 30 text, 6 image · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Justt Fintech Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 36 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 81 in chargeback management

Segment leader

24%

Chargeflow

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 68 answers
Its own site cited: in 68 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on justt.ai

477

subdomains included

Content

195

counted in the table below

Documentation

129

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	128	6	2026-09-15	Merchants of record, Ecommerce fraud
Glossary or explainer	25	0	2025-08-26
Report or ebook	17	0	2025-08-05	Chargeback management
Comparison	16	3	2026-08-02	Chargeback management
Case study	5	0	2025-12-15
Webinar or virtual event	4	0	2026-04-20	Chargeback management

Most recent

2026-09-15Chargeback ratio blog
2026-09-02Chargebackx 2026 blog
2026-08-27Real chargeback recovery rate blog
2026-08-18Mastercard gmap blog
2026-08-02Google play vs app store chargebacks comparison
2026-07-21Enterprise grade ai needs enterprise grade governance blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page justt.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Justt

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Justt is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-native, enterprise-grade chargeback management
justt.ai
For: high-volume merchants
justt.ai
Price stated: Custom pricing available upon demo request justt.ai/integrations
Starting price: 0 justt.ai/integrations
Integrations claimed: 50 justt.ai/platform
Certifications: SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018GDPRCCPAPCIISO 27001:2022
Hosting: North Virginia, US.USA
Customers named: EnebaMarley SpoonHostingerSimply
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial

What Justt's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: justt.ai, trust.justt.ai, justt.ai/platform, justt.ai/customers, justt.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Justt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Justt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Justt by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Justt is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Justt, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.