Finance AI Index

Index › Products › Edgar Services · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Edgar Services

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Edgar Services was named 1 time in Disclosure reporting, where Workiva led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business35 of 75

under the label threshold

Mid-market28 of 63

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In disclosure reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Edgar Services for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SEC and disclosure reporting	Accounting and close	0%	28 of 63	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Edgar Services yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Edgar Services across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a full‑service EDGAR filing agent (e.g., ACII, Edgar Services) with per‑filing pricing is the most economical option” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Disclosure reporting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Edgar Services, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Edgar Services was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DFIN ActiveDisclosure2 of 20Not among the top eight

Workiva2 of 20Not among the top eight

Certent Disclosure Management1 of 21Not among the top eight

EDGARsuite™ Software1 of 21Not among the top eight

IRIS CARBON1 of 21Not among the top eight

ACII1 of 20Not among the top eight

Certent1 of 20Not among the top eight

EDGARsuite1 of 20Not among the top eight

Federal Filings LLC1 of 20Not among the top eight

FinPress1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Edgar Services. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Edgar Services and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cfoshortlist.com2

edgar-services.com2

edgarsuite.comYour site2

houseblend.io2

sec.gov2

blog.9cv9.com1

blog.acii.com1

capterra.com1

dfinsolutions.com1

edgar.acii.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Edgar Services came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cfoshortlist.com/reports/best-disclosure-management-software2

cfoshortlist.com/reports/sec-reporting-software2

edgarsuite.com/2

houseblend.io/articles/sec-filing-software-platforms-pricing-compliance2

sec.gov/submit-filings2

blog.9cv9.com/top-10-financial-reporting-software-to-try-in-20261

blog.acii.com/sec-edgar-html-filings1

capterra.com/p/236477/Certent-Disclosure-Management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

edgarsuite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Edgar Services takes 0% of first choices and Workiva takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sec and disclosure reporting platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sec and disclosure reporting platform”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 11 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 25 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 465
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 28 of 63 in disclosure reporting

Segment leader

32%

Workiva

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 2 answers
Its own site cited: in 2 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Edgar Services

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Edgar Services is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Free plan or trial: free demo edgarsuite.com
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Edgar Services's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: edgarsuite.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Edgar Services's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Edgar Services, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Edgar Services by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Edgar Services is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Edgar Services, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.