AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Fenergo · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Fenergo

15Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in AML monitoring for enterprise buyers
Rank 32 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fenergo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance0%32 of 1080%2under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fenergo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fenergo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose a more enterprise-heavy suite like Feedzai or Fenergo” GPT-5.4 mini · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“Need onboarding + KYC + AML in one governed flow: Fenergo” GPT-5.4 mini · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fenergo, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fenergo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NICE Actimize10 of 155Not among the top eight
ComplyAdvantage9 of 150Not among the top eight
Feedzai7 of 150Not among the top eight
Unit214 of 152Not among the top eight
SAS AML4 of 150Not among the top eight
Flagright3 of 150Not among the top eight
LexisNexis Risk Solutions3 of 150Not among the top eight
Quantexa3 of 150Not among the top eight
SAS3 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fenergo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 15 answers that named Fenergo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fenergo.comYour site4
fraud.net4
fraudio.com4
guideflow.com4
niceactimize.com4
riskpublishing.com4
sas.com4
amlwatcher.com3
g2.com3
gartner.com3

Thirty-three of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Fenergo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fenergo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fenergo takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“fenergo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
29 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,213 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,251 · 277 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,065
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
58 ads · 50 text, 8 video · 43 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2023, as Fenergo, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year, 48 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 108 in AML monitoring
Segment leader
33%
ComplyAdvantage
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on fenergo.com
1,844
subdomains included
Content
1,228
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
1 · 9
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog548undatedBusiness banking
News or press451982026-10-01
Webinar or virtual event7532026-09-16
Report or ebook69undated
Podcast or video50undated
Comparison10undated
Glossary or explainer10undated
Conference or event7undated
Case study4undated
Template or tool4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fenergo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Fenergo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fenergo is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Financial Compliance Software | CLM and KYC
For
banking and financial institutions
Certifications
AWS Financial Services Specialization Partner
Customers named
BNP ParibasSantanderNorthern TrustABN AmroMizuhoTMF GroupLBBW
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Fenergo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fenergo.com, trust.fenergo.com, fenergo.com/platform, fenergo.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fenergo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fenergo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fenergo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Fenergo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fenergo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fenergo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.