AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › FilePoint · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

FilePoint

13Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
1% in Disclosure reporting for small business buyers
Rank 18 of 63 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In disclosure reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FilePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SEC and disclosure reportingAccounting and close0%18 of 630%2under 10 labels · led by Workiva at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FilePoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FilePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FilePoint is a great low-cost option if you need a lightweight, rapid-deployment solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Disclosure reporting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FilePoint, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FilePoint was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva12 of 132Not among the top eight
DFIN ActiveDisclosure11 of 132Not among the top eight
Certent Disclosure Management10 of 136Not among the top eight
IRIS CARBON8 of 134Not among the top eight
Arelle4 of 130Not among the top eight
EdgarEase3 of 130Not among the top eight
CoreFiling TrueFiling2 of 131Not among the top eight
ActiveDisclosure2 of 130Not among the top eight
NAVEX One2 of 130Not among the top eight
Onspring2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FilePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named FilePoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wifitalents.com13
houseblend.io12
cfoshortlist.com11
zipdo.co10
g2.com9
dfinsolutions.com7
grctools.net7
itechguides.com7
capterra.com6
sourceforge.net6

Eighty-eight of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming FilePoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

filepoint.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, FilePoint takes 0% of first choices and Workiva takes 32%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sec and disclosure reporting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sec and disclosure reporting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
110 a month (“filepoint”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 300 a month
Searches its site ranks for
297 · 2 in the top three
Sites linking to it
802
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
30 ads · 18 text, 12 image · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2022, as FilePoint EDGAR Services, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 16 in the year, 14 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 63 in disclosure reporting
Segment leader
32%
Workiva
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on filepoint.com
322
subdomains included
Content
257
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Conference or event137512026-12-30
News or press10582026-10-02
Blog1432026-09-24
Template or tool112026-08-11

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page filepoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow FilePoint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

FilePoint is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Experts in EDGAR Filing + iXBRL Filing Services
For
clients in the financial industry; fund administrators; advisers; asset managers and investment advisers; investment companies
Certifications
SEC- and FINRA-compliant
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What FilePoint's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: filepoint.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FilePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FilePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for FilePoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where FilePoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name FilePoint, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at filepoint.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.