Every category where a model named Onspring for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	2%	10 of 71	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Onspring yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Onspring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Onspring (Best Overall for Mid-Market)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal controls · direct prompt · first choice

“Several reviewers highlight these as the sweet spot: a modern UI, no-code configurability, reasonable cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If you need broader risk management beyond SOX, Onspring or AuditBoard are safer long-term bets.” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Companies that need a highly customizable, no-code workflow builder.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Onspring, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onspring was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva18 of 290Not in the top three

AuditBoard14 of 291Not in the top three

Hyperproof13 of 294Not in the top three

Drata13 of 293Not in the top three

Vanta10 of 292Not in the top three

FloQast9 of 296Not in the top three

MetricStream7 of 291Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud6 of 291Not in the top three

Diligent One Platform6 of 290Not in the top three

Optro5 of 291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onspring. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 29 answers that named Onspring and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org23

optro.ai19

netwrix.com16

highradius.com14

riskpublishing.com13

checkthat.ai11

gitnux.org11

riskwatch.com10

complianceofficer.ai8

gartner.com8

133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Onspring came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software16

optro.ai/blog/best-sox-management-software15

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-sox-compliance-tools13

riskpublishing.com/best-sox-compliance-software-compared13

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-tools-for-sarbanes-oxley-act-compliance10

worldmetrics.org/best/sox-controls-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/sox-compliance-audit-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onspring's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onspring, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onspring.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.