Every category where a model named Fingerprint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Ecommerce fraud prevention	Receivables and billing	0%	21 of 70	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fingerprint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fingerprint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Fingerprint offers a free tier up to 1,000 API calls per month... making it a good entry-level option.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · alternative

“Layer with: Fingerprint for device fingerprinting (free tier)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · alternative

“Device intelligence | High (top G2) | Prevents ATO in B2B logins” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · alternative

“Fingerprint free tier for device fingerprinting underneath” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce fraud · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Fingerprint and Forter are solid platforms with known weaknesses around false positives and transparency” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative

“Users have reported issues with unreliable alerts due to false positives” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fingerprint, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fingerprint was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Signifyd26 of 347Not among the top eight

Stripe Radar22 of 345Not among the top eight

SEON21 of 342Not among the top eight

Sift21 of 342Not among the top eight

Riskified19 of 341Not among the top eight

Forter18 of 341Not among the top eight

NoFraud17 of 348Not among the top eight

Kount15 of 340Not among the top eight

ClearSale11 of 341Not among the top eight

Chargeflow8 of 340Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fingerprint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Fingerprint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com28

learn.g2.com24

clickpost.ai21

fingerprint.comYour site21

guideflow.com18

cside.com17

fraud.net17

shoplazza.com16

whop.com16

stripe.com12

169 of the 190 domain citations in answers naming Fingerprint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/e-commerce-fraud-protection27

learn.g2.com/best-e-commerce-fraud-protection-software24

clickpost.ai/blog/ecommerce-fraud-prevention-software21

fingerprint.com/blog/e-commerce-fraud-prevention-software20

guideflow.com/blog/ecommerce-fraud-protection-software18

cside.com/blog/ecommerce-fraud-prevention-software16

shoplazza.com/blog/fraud-protection-solutions-for-ecommerce16

whop.com/blog/ecommerce-fraud-prevention-tools16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

fingerprint.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Fingerprint takes 0% of first choices and SEON takes 16%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ecommerce fraud prevention platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 60,500 a month (“fingerprint”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 61,275 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 32,146 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,129 · 311 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 5,365
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

103 ads · 52 video, 45 text, 6 image · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as FingerprintJS, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 76 in the year, 27 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 70 in ecommerce fraud

Segment leader

16%

SEON

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 34 answers
Its own site cited: in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on fingerprint.com

956

subdomains included

Content

460

counted in the table below

Documentation

245

Product · Integration

13 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days
Blog	379	undated
Case study	24	undated
Webinar or virtual event	19	undated
Glossary or explainer	14	undated
Template or tool	10	undated
Comparison	9	undated
Conference or event	2	undated
News or press	2	undated
Podcast or video	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fingerprint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Fingerprint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fingerprint; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fingerprint (FingerprintJS) 1

Follow Fingerprint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fingerprint is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The Fingerprint device intelligence platform works across web and mobile applications to identify all visitors with industry-leading accuracy — even if they’re anonymous.
fingerprint.com
For: Customers
fingerprint.com/pricing
Price stated: Free: $0 /month; Pro Plus: starting at $99 /month for 20K API calls then $4 per 1,000 additional API calls; Enterprise: Custom fingerprint.com/pricing
Starting price: 0 fingerprint.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Collect visitor IDs and signals instantly for free, or reach out to our team for a demo. fingerprint.com
Certifications: GDPR and CCPA compliant99.9% SLACCPACSA STARGDPRISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27001 SoASOC 2
Customers named: Booking.comSchoolhouseRecentRebornSchoolhouse, Sal Khan's free tutoring platforma Web3 racing gameCheckout.comNeimanMarcus.comGaia.com
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, hosting

What Fingerprint's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: fingerprint.com, fingerprint.com/pricing, trust.fingerprint.com, fingerprint.com/use-cases, fingerprint.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fingerprint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fingerprint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fingerprint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Fingerprint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fingerprint, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.