| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce fraud prevention | Receivables and billing | 4% | 8 of 70 | 16% | 44 | accepted challenger | |
| Chargeback management | Receivables and billing | 0% | 18 of 81 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24% | |
| AML and transaction monitoring | Tax and compliance | 0% | 59 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Sift for most mid-market B2B ecommerce—it's consistently #1 in G2 rankings for balanced performance without overkill.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
“Sift maintains #1 position across all fraud prevention categories in G2's Fall 2025 Reports” Muse Glimmer 30B · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sift - Top-rated on G2 for real-time detection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best all-around choice is usually Sift” GPT-5.4 mini · Ecommerce fraud · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Can be complex to configure; occasional false positives requiring manual review. Not ideal for very small teams due to setup overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike consumer-focused tools (like Sift or Stripe Radar), these are specifically designed for B2B payment workflows” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce fraud · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Some users note that the system can occasionally generate false positives, which may require additional review time.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sift has received significant criticism from users regarding inaccuracy and false positives” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Ecommerce fraud · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 153 of the 161 answers that named Sift and are not a share of its labels.
609 of the 609 domain citations in answers naming Sift came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 528 | 15 | 2026-10-02 | Ecommerce fraud | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 46 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Case study | 42 | 0 | 2025-07-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 33 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | Ecommerce fraud | |
| Podcast or video | 28 | 0 | 2025-10-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2025-03-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-09-16 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Every page sift.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Sift's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sift.com, sift.com/platform, sift.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sift's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sift, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sift by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: