Every category where a model named Hawk AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AML and transaction monitoring	Tax and compliance	0%	21 of 108	15%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hawk AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hawk AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern SaaS platforms (ComplyAdvantage, Alloy, Unit21, Hawk AI) — faster deployment, more flexible pricing, good for mid-market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AML monitoring · scale prompt · alternative

“those strong in AI-driven false positive reduction like Feedzai, Hawk AI, or Unit21 for fintechs” Grok 4.1 Fast · AML monitoring · negative prompt · alternative

“AI-driven AML and fraud detection, with strong alert quality and investigation workflows.” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Unit21 / Hawk AI / Feedzai if you need real-time fraud + AML convergence” Muse Glimmer 30B · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“excellent for fintechs, neobanks, and web3 companies... However, they are highly sensitive to data quality.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

“their suitability depends on your business model, transaction volume, and regulatory requirements” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hawk AI, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hawk AI was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ComplyAdvantage22 of 273Not among the top eight

Unit2120 of 273Not among the top eight

NICE Actimize19 of 274Not among the top eight

Sardine16 of 270Not among the top eight

Feedzai15 of 271Not among the top eight

Alessa14 of 270Not among the top eight

Sumsub10 of 270Not among the top eight

Oracle Financial Crime and Compliance Management8 of 271Not among the top eight

LexisNexis Risk Solutions6 of 270Not among the top eight

Sanction Scanner6 of 270Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hawk AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 27 answers that named Hawk AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cside.com16

sphinxhq.com16

bureau.id14

fraud.net10

fraudio.com10

devopsschool.com9

fintechspecs.com8

amlwatcher.com7

worldmetrics.org7

gartner.com6

103 of the 103 domain citations in answers naming Hawk AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cside.com/blog/best-transaction-monitoring-software16

sphinxhq.com/blog-posts/best-aml-software16

bureau.id/resources/blog/transaction-monitoring-software14

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-aml-transaction-monitoring-tools-features-pros-cons-compar9

amlwatcher.com/blog/aml-software-vendors7

fraudio.com/roundups/best-aml-transaction-monitoring-software6

pwc.com/gx/en/news-room/assets/analyst-citations/chartis_aml_transaction_monitoring-soluti6

riskpublishing.com/best-anti-money-laundering-aml-software-compa6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

hawk.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Hawk AI takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“hawk ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3,515 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 813 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 197 · 22 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,666
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

29 ads · 29 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2021, as Hawk AI Gmbh, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 10 in the year, 19 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 108 in AML monitoring

Segment leader

33%

ComplyAdvantage

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 27 answers
Its own site cited: in 27 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on hawk.ai

211

subdomains included

Content

166

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

22 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	142	9	2026-09-29
Blog	12	undated
Webinar or virtual event	7	0	2026-02-18
Case study	2	2	2026-09-09
Conference or event	1	0	2026-03-05
Report or ebook	1	0	2026-04-29
Comparison	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Hawk expands agentic ai suite cdd agent eliminate bandwidth bottlenecks enhance news or press
2026-09-29News press news or press
2026-09-28Hawk appoints marshall billingslea former us treasury assistant secretary terrorist news or press
2026-09-23Hawk outlines framework governing agentic ai financial crime investigations news or press
2026-09-16Reducing false positives sanctions watchlist screening ai news or press
2026-09-16Hawk launches new ai risk screening capabilities tackle false positives news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hawk.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Hawk AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Hawk AI is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Award-winning AML & CFT technology powered by explainable AI increases your risk coverage, helps you identify more crime, and reduces your false positives.
hawk.ai
For: Banks, payment firms, and fintechs worldwide
hawk.ai
Customers named: AlviereEburyVakifbankVR PaymentVakıfBankVodafone FijiOTTO PaymentsRatepay
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Hawk AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hawk.ai, hawk.ai/solutions/aml, hawk.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hawk AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hawk AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Hawk AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Hawk AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Hawk AI, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.