Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › KAYAK for Business · September 2026 Edition
Kayak · 1 category · Named, not ranked

KAYAK for Business

6Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. KAYAK for Business was named 1 time in Corporate travel managem, where Navan led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named KAYAK for Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate travel managementSpend and procurement0%36 of 60100%1under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for KAYAK for Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated KAYAK for Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“failed to show taxes and resort fees on the cheapest listings, leading to much higher final bills” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate travel managem · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as KAYAK for Business, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and KAYAK for Business was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TravelPerk6 of 63Not in the top three
Navan5 of 61Not in the top three
SAP Concur4 of 62Not in the top three
Booking.com for Business4 of 60Not in the top three
Expedia for Business4 of 60Not in the top three
American Express Global Business Travel3 of 60Not in the top three
Engine2 of 60Not in the top three
Agoda1 of 60Not in the top three
Airbnb1 of 60Not in the top three
BCD Travel1 of 60Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named KAYAK for Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 6 answers that named KAYAK for Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4
rippling.com4
learn.g2.com3
ottotheagent.com3
gartner.com2
myhospitalnow.com2
navan.com2
rfp.wiki2
routespring.com2
5wpr.com1

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming KAYAK for Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as KAYAK for Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as KAYAK for Business; a claim can dispute any of them.
Kayak 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when KAYAK for Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as KAYAK for Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kayak.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack