Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Maxima · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Maxima

15Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Maxima was named 1 time in Financial close manageme, where FloQast led with 60%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market44 of 68

under the label threshold

Enterprise40 of 67

under the label threshold

In financial close manageme · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Maxima for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	44 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Maxima yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Maxima across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Maxima, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maxima was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BlackLine7 of 152Not in the top three

FloQast6 of 153Not in the top three

Numeric6 of 151Not in the top three

Vic.ai6 of 150Not in the top three

HighRadius5 of 151Not in the top three

Digits2 of 151Not in the top three

Sage Intacct2 of 151Not in the top three

Trintech2 of 151Not in the top three

Trintech Adra2 of 151Not in the top three

Basis2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maxima. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 15 answers that named Maxima and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

maxima.aiYour site9

worldmetrics.org5

cfodive.com4

fast.io4

numeric.io4

aimultiple.com3

layer3labs.io3

tfsfventures.com3

aibuzz.blog2

businesswire.com2

Thirty of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Maxima came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cfodive.com/news/maxima-rolls-out-ai-agent-enterprise-accounting/8235674

fast.io/resources/best-ai-agents-accounting-finance-20264

maxima.ai/articles/ai-tools-for-accounting4

aimultiple.com/accounting-ai-agent3

layer3labs.io/comparisons/best-ai-tools-for-accounting-firms3

tfsfventures.com/blog/best-ai-agents-for-accounting-firms-in-2026-ranked-and-reviewed3

worldmetrics.org/best/ai-bookkeeping-software3

aibuzz.blog/best-ai-accounting-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maxima's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maxima, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at maxima.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.