AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Napier AI · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Napier AI

12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Napier AI was named 8 times in AML monitoring, where ComplyAdvantage led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Napier AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance0%24 of 1080%8under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Napier AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Napier AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excellent for compliance teams prioritizing AI-powered transaction monitoring and streamlined case management.” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“For best transaction monitoring specialization: Napier AI, FraudNet, or SymphonyAI Sensa.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Napier AI is best for FinTechs and mid-sized institutions prioritizing innovation and flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“Emerging leader (AI-focused for real-time monitoring, often praised for fintech scalability).” Grok 4.1 Fast · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Napier AI, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Napier AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ComplyAdvantage10 of 123Not among the top eight
NICE Actimize8 of 121Not among the top eight
Alessa5 of 121Not among the top eight
Quantexa5 of 121Not among the top eight
Unit215 of 120Not among the top eight
ThetaRay4 of 120Not among the top eight
Feedzai3 of 121Not among the top eight
LexisNexis Risk Solutions3 of 121Not among the top eight
SAS Anti-Money Laundering3 of 121Not among the top eight
Verafin2 of 121Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Napier AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Napier AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fraud.net9
bureau.id8
pwc.com7
complyadvantage.com6
cside.com4
ondato.com4
sphinxhq.com4
symphonyai.com4
alessa.com3
amlwatcher.com3

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Napier AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

napier.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Napier AI takes 0% of first choices and ComplyAdvantage takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “aml and transaction monitoring platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
170 a month (“napier ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 12,948 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,241 · 172 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,973
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 24 of 108 in AML monitoring
Segment leader
33%
ComplyAdvantage
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
12 answers
Its own site cited
in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on napier.ai
639
subdomains included
Content
608
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog542172026-10-05
Case study19undated
Glossary or explainer1402025-01-22
Podcast or video1402025-11-20
Report or ebook902025-01-22
Webinar or virtual event502025-01-22
Conference or event402026-06-15
News or press1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on napier.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page napier.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Napier AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Napier AI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI powered Anti-Money Laundering platform to combat evolving threats; next generation anti-money laundering and financial crime compliance software
For
financial institutions, insurance, and wealth and asset management firms
Certifications
ISO 27001:2022 CertifiedSOC2 Type 2 AuditedFSQS RegisteredFounding Member of the IRTAISO 27001 : 2022 CertifiedRegTech100 2025
Customers named
Banco do BrasilStarlingFinancial HouseBCS Global Markets
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Napier AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: napier.ai, napier.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Napier AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Napier AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Napier AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Napier AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Napier AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at napier.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.