| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML and transaction monitoring | Tax and compliance | 0% | 24 of 108 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Excellent for compliance teams prioritizing AI-powered transaction monitoring and streamlined case management.” Mistral Small · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“For best transaction monitoring specialization: Napier AI, FraudNet, or SymphonyAI Sensa.” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Napier AI is best for FinTechs and mid-sized institutions prioritizing innovation and flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AML monitoring · direct prompt · alternative
“Emerging leader (AI-focused for real-time monitoring, often praised for fintech scalability).” Grok 4.1 Fast · AML monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Napier AI and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Napier AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 542 | 17 | 2026-10-05 | ||
| Case study | 19 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 14 | 0 | 2025-01-22 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 0 | 2025-11-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 9 | 0 | 2025-01-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | 0 | 2025-01-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on napier.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page napier.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Napier AI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: napier.ai, napier.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Napier AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Napier AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Napier AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: