Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Nav Business · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Nav Business

22Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in B2B credit management for small business buyers
Rank 14 of 82 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nav Business for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
B2B credit managementReceivables and billing2%14 of 820%8under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nav Business yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nav Business across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“includes Bectran, D&B Credit Reporter, Experian Business CreditScore Pro, Merclex, and Nav Business” Llama 4 Maverick · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need credit score visibility: Use Nav Business for free” GLM 4.7 FlashX · B2B credit management · budget prompt · alternative
“Best US-Focused Risk Data: Nav Business or Merclex” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nav Business, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nav Business was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Chaser12 of 225Not in the top three
Merclex12 of 223Not in the top three
Paidnice11 of 223Not in the top three
Experian Business CreditScore Pro8 of 220Not in the top three
D&B Credit Reporter5 of 220Not in the top three
HighRadius Credit Cloud5 of 220Not in the top three
Satago5 of 220Not in the top three
Bectran4 of 221Not in the top three
Creditsafe4 of 220Not in the top three
Tesorio3 of 222Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nav Business. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named Nav Business and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

merclex.com17
tesorio.com15
chaserhq.com13
creditpulse.com13
nuvo.com10
paidnice.com9
trove.works8
f6s.com7
learn.g2.com7
nav.comYour site7

Ninety-nine of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Nav Business came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Nav Business

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nav Business; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nav 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nav Business's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nav Business, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nav.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack