5 categories · RankedUpflow
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 9% | 4 of 83 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Accounts receivable automation | Receivables and billing | 6% | 6 of 77 | 0% | 17 | accepted challenger |
| B2B credit management | Receivables and billing | 4% | 9 of 82 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16% |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 2% | 12 of 91 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17% |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 2% | 17 of 86 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Upflow - Good fit for mid-sized and scaling companies (typically $10M-$500M revenue) that need cash application to feed directly into AR and collections” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice
“Upflow is often recommended as the best overall solution due to its seamless integration with collections and AR workflows” Mistral Small · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice
“the best fit is usually Upflow if you want a modern credit/collections tool with a publicly available free plan” Perplexity Sonar · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice
“Upflow (for workflow focus) or Billtrust (for full-stack AR focus) are the safest starting points” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“by ARR/invoice value (Upflow, quote-only)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 121 answers that named Upflow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
306 of the 365 domain citations in answers naming Upflow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Upflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Upflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upflow.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.