AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Oracle Mantas · October 2026 Edition
Oracle · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Oracle Mantas

15Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oracle Mantas was named 5 times in AML monitoring, where ComplyAdvantage led with 33%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In aml monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oracle Mantas for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AML and transaction monitoringTax and compliance0%108 of 108100%5under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Mantas yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Mantas across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“NICE Actimize & Oracle Mantas ... Outdated architecture: Monolithic systems that can't scale horizontally” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AML monitoring · negative prompt · hard negative
“critiquing legacy vendors like NICE Actimize, SAS AML, Oracle Mantas, and FICO TONBELLER (Siron) for their shortcomings” Muse Glimmer 30B · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“Part of the "legacy triad" (with Actimize and SAS) that analysts frequently call out.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
“notoriously difficult for smaller or mid-market organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AML monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Mantas, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Mantas was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
NICE Actimize14 of 150Not among the top eight
SAS AML10 of 150Not among the top eight
ComplyAdvantage8 of 150Not among the top eight
Unit215 of 150Not among the top eight
Flagright4 of 152Not among the top eight
FICO TONBELLER3 of 150Not among the top eight
LexisNexis Risk Solutions3 of 150Not among the top eight
Sardine3 of 150Not among the top eight
CipherTrace2 of 150Not among the top eight
FICO TONBELLER / Siron2 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Mantas. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Oracle Mantas and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where Oracle Mantas stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
70 a month (“oracle mantas”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Its own site
It sits on Oracle's site (oracle.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 108 of 108 in AML monitoring
Segment leader
33%
ComplyAdvantage
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Oracle Mantas

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oracle is the company behind Oracle Mantas.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
We empower anti–money laundering (AML) and compliance leaders with the right tools to protect their institution from illicit actors and regulatory fines while helping reduce their compliance costs.
For
anti–money laundering (AML) and compliance leaders
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Oracle Mantas's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oracle.com/ae/financial-services/aml-financial-crime-compliance, oracle.com/br/financial-services/aml-financial-crime-compliance, oracle.com/apac/financial-services/aml-financial-crime-compliance, oracle.com/asean/financial-services/aml-financial-crime-compliance, oracle.com/latam/financial-services/aml-financial-crime-compliance. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Mantas's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Mantas, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oracle Mantas by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Oracle Mantas is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oracle Mantas, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.