Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 of 111, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedPaymentWorks
5Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PaymentWorks was named 2 times in Supplier management, where Precoro led with 14%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 117
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market9 of 111
4%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PaymentWorks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 4% | 9 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PaymentWorks held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Supplier management · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 9 of 107, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier management | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 9 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PaymentWorks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PaymentWorks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend PaymentWorks as a strong vendor onboarding and information management platform.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: PaymentWorks ... is the strongest, most focused choice for a mid-sized B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PaymentWorks, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PaymentWorks was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PaymentWorks, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PaymentWorks was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PaymentWorks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named PaymentWorks and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
paymentworks.comYour site5
g2.com3
spendflo.com3
creditpulse.com2
eftsure.com2
f6s.com2
graphiteconnect.com2
highradius.com2
learn.g2.com2
trustmi.ai2
Twenty of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming PaymentWorks came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on paymentworks.com
785
subdomains included
Content
166
counted in the table below
Documentation
232
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 48 | 0 | 2026-06-14 | ||
| News or press | 33 | 0 | 2026-03-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | 0 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 16 | 0 | 2020-09-01 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 2 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 7 | 2026-11-08 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-07-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-082026 afp conference conference or event
- 2026-11-02Iofm fall conference conference or event
- 2026-10-142026 asbo annual conference conference or event
- 2026-09-14Shared services outsourcing week conference conference or event
- 2026-09-11Know your vendor checklist how to authenticate vendor identity template or tool
- 2026-09-03Pw hosted whats changed since the nacha deadline and whats coming next conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page paymentworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow PaymentWorks
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PaymentWorks is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PaymentWorks is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Trusted vendor identity platform that brings efficiency and security to the chaos of highly manual vendor onboarding and payments security.
- For
- Businesses managing vendors, contractors, and suppliers
- Customers named
- Cabarrus CountyCity of Vista, CaliforniaUniversity of TennesseeThe University of North Carolina—AshevilleUniversity of North TexasCommunity CollegeCity of VistaUniversity of Tennessee System
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What PaymentWorks's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: paymentworks.com, paymentworks.com, paymentworks.com/tag/compliance, paymentworks.com/product, paymentworks.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PaymentWorks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PaymentWorks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PaymentWorks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PaymentWorks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PaymentWorks, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.