Every category where a model named RightRev for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	4%	7 of 77	0%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RightRev yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RightRev across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels4

Paraphrase19 labelsNone

Comparative20 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative9 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: High-growth B2B SaaS scaling between $50M and $1B in ARR... highly praised for its speed of innovation and policy-driven automation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · first choice

“Well-regarded dedicated solutions include RightRev, Zuora (for enterprise), and newer entrants like Zenskar, Ordway, and Maxio” Kimi K2 · Revenue recognition · negative prompt · first choice

“layering a specialist like RightRev or Trullion on top of an existing stack” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you want a dedicated, fast-to-implement SaaS solution → LedgerUp or RightRev.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue recognition · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RightRev, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RightRev was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zuora Revenue55 of 8321Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management51 of 831Not in the top three

Maxio41 of 836Not in the top three

SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting41 of 831Not in the top three

Sage Intacct28 of 834Not in the top three

Workday Financial Management22 of 831Not in the top three

LedgerUp17 of 832Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec17 of 831Not in the top three

Ordway15 of 833Not in the top three

BillingPlatform12 of 832Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RightRev. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 83 answers that named RightRev and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rightrev.comYour site60

ledgerup.ai49

eleven.run41

younium.com37

worldmetrics.org35

guideflow.com33

hubifi.com33

dualentry.com31

getapp.com30

erpresearch.com23

312 of the 372 domain citations in answers naming RightRev came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rightrev.com/top-revenue-recognition-software-2026-a-comprehensive-buyers-guide46

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202642

eleven.run/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software41

younium.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software35

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software33

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software31

ledgerup.ai/resources/best-asc-606-revenue-recognition-software-202631

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-revenue-recognition-tools23

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RightRev's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RightRev, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rightrev.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.