Every category where a model named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	37 of 77	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative17 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for large enterprises already using SAP” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Larger enterprises needing integrated financials — possibly overkill at 500 people” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · scale prompt · soft negative

“Limitations: Complex implementation, expensive, enterprise-only” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue recognition · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zuora Revenue46 of 5426Not in the top three

RightRev41 of 546Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management39 of 542Not in the top three

Workday Financial Management23 of 541Not in the top three

Maxio15 of 540Not in the top three

Oracle Revenue Management Cloud11 of 540Not in the top three

BillingPlatform9 of 541Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec9 of 540Not in the top three

LedgerUp8 of 541Not in the top three

Workday Revenue Management8 of 540Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 54 answers that named SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rightrev.com42

younium.com32

eleven.run30

ledgerup.ai29

dualentry.com24

highradius.com23

hubifi.com23

worldmetrics.org22

guideflow.com21

getapp.com20

266 of the 266 domain citations in answers naming SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rightrev.com/top-revenue-recognition-software-2026-a-comprehensive-buyers-guide40

eleven.run/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software30

younium.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software29

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software24

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202624

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-revenue-recognition-tools23

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software21

ledgerup.ai/resources/best-asc-606-revenue-recognition-software-202618

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP Revenue Management 3SAP RAR 1SAP Revenue Accounting 1SAP Revenue Recognition 1Workday / SAP RAR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Revenue Accounting and Reporting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.