Every category where a model named Sustain.Life for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	4%	10 of 76	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sustain.Life yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sustain.Life across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels4

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative2 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sustain.Life at $49/month offers the best balance of features and affordability” Kimi K2 · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“the best ESG reporting software options are Sustain.Life and Wardn” Mistral Small · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“Good for small businesses wanting simple carbon tracking + reporting” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative

“consider Greenly or Sustain.Life” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sustain.Life, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sustain.Life was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenly14 of 254Not in the top three

Workiva12 of 251Not in the top three

Sweep11 of 250Not in the top three

Wardn10 of 252Not in the top three

ExecutESG9 of 254Not in the top three

IBM Envizi8 of 250Not in the top three

Persefoni7 of 254Not in the top three

Coolset7 of 250Not in the top three

Novisto6 of 252Not in the top three

Sphera6 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sustain.Life. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 25 answers that named Sustain.Life and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

climefy.com18

coolset.com16

gartner.com15

g2.com14

guideflow.com12

executesg.com10

wardn.com10

onestopesg.com9

aibusinessgeek.com8

f6s.com7

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Sustain.Life came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

climefy.com/blog/top-5-esg-compliance-software18

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools15

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software15

g2.com/categories/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-reporting/small-business14

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software12

executesg.com/resources/blog/esg-software-pricing-202610

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-esg-reporting-software-20268

wardn.com/blog/best-esg-software-for-smbs8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sustain.Life's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sustain.Life, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sustain.life is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.