1 category · RankedWatershed
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESG and carbon reporting | Equity and corporate | 0% | 15 of 76 | 17% | 18 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It is the market leader for Scope 3 and supply chain emissions.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · first choice
“If your goal is to accurately calculate a highly complex carbon footprint across thousands of suppliers, choose Watershed or Sweep.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Watershed if: Your immediate goal is accurate carbon accounting and engaging suppliers to reduce Scope 3.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Persefoni or Watershed if your main job is carbon accounting and decarbonization.” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some enterprise platforms like Watershed assume dedicated sustainability staff and full custom pricing with no standard SMB tier or transparent pricing.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“rather than enterprise‑only platforms like Workiva or Watershed” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · soft negative
“the enterprise cost and complexity won't be justified” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 62 answers that named Watershed and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
207 of the 207 domain citations in answers naming Watershed came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Watershed's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Watershed, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at watershed.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.