1 category · Named, not rankedTrustform
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML and transaction monitoring | Tax and compliance | 4% | 6 of 108 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by ComplyAdvantage at 33% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Trustform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Single auditable workspace for onboarding, risk scoring, and ongoing monitoring.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AML monitoring · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best overall fit is Trustform” Perplexity Sonar · AML monitoring · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trustform, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trustform was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Trustform and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fourteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Trustform came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 47 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 18 | 2 | 2026-07-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-05 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Deleting a user account report or ebook
- 2026-07-09Corporate onboarding best practices blog
- 2026-07-09Corporate onboarding best practices blog
- 2026-06-30Aml screening solutions blog
- 2026-06-30Aml screening solutions blog
- 2026-06-26Binderr alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trustform.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Trustform
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Trustform is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Portable KYB, KYC, AML & Client Onboarding Platform
- For
- businesses ready to scale; compliance and operational teams
- Certifications
- GDPR
- Hosting
- EUUKUSAIreland
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers
What Trustform's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: trustform.io, trust.trustform.io. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trustform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trustform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trustform by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trustform is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trustform, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.