Every category where a model named Whop for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Payment orchestration platforms	Receivables and billing	2%	15 of 81	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by BlueSnap at 18%
Merchants of record	Receivables and billing	2%	10 of 45	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Paddle at 28%
Embedded payments platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	20 of 110	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	54 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Whop yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Whop across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained20 labels5

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a limited budget, start with Whop if you need global coverage and want predictable transparent pricing.” MiniMax M2.5 · Payment orchestration · budget prompt · first choice

“such as Freemius, Gumroad, Lemon Squeezy, or Whop” Llama 4 Maverick · Merchants of record · budget prompt · first choice

“Whop at 2.7% + $0.30 is the lowest option, though it may have limitations depending on your product type” MiniMax M2.5 · Merchants of record · budget prompt · alternative

“Finix or Whop would be better long-term choices despite slightly higher setup costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Embedded payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“useful if your business model matches their niche positioning, but they are less clearly presented in the results as the lowest-budget general choice” Perplexity Sonar · Embedded payments · budget prompt · soft negative

“Whop — be cautious if you need a *full* MoR.” GPT-6 Luna · Merchants of record · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Whop, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Whop was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Paddle13 of 360Not among the top eight

Lemon Squeezy12 of 363Not among the top eight

Stripe Connect9 of 365Not among the top eight

Gumroad9 of 360Not among the top eight

Freemius8 of 362Not among the top eight

Dodo Payments8 of 361Not among the top eight

Finix8 of 361Not among the top eight

Stripe8 of 360Not among the top eight

Corefy6 of 360Not among the top eight

Spreedly6 of 360Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Whop. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 36 answers that named Whop and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com30

whop.comYour site27

sourceforge.net15

dodopayments.com11

stripe.com11

freemius.com10

g2.com10

slashdot.org10

techrepublic.com10

fitsmallbusiness.com8

115 of the 142 domain citations in answers naming Whop came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/embedded-payments-software11

guideflow.com/blog/merchant-of-record-software11

whop.com/blog/embedded-payments-platforms11

freemius.com/blog/best-merchant-of-record-providers-saas-stage10

whop.com/blog/payment-orchestration-platforms8

guideflow.com/blog/payment-orchestration-software7

fiska.com/blog/best-embedded-payment-solutions-for-saas6

stripe.com/resources/more/embedded-payments-how-to-choose-the-right-system6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

whop.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Whop takes 2% of first choices and BlueSnap takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “payment orchestration platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “payment orchestration platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“whop”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1,336 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 352,812 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 50,893 · 1,204 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 14,905
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

36+ ads · 25 text, 11 image · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2025, as REGINA CELI DOS SANTOS, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 36 in the year. 84 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 81 in payment orchestration

Segment leader

18%

BlueSnap

First choices: 5 across its categories
Named in: 36 answers
Its own site cited: in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on whop.com

4,008

subdomains included

Content

2,036

counted in the table below

Documentation

993

Product · Integration

12 · 28

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	1,572	26	2026-09-29
Comparison	151	12	2026-09-02
Glossary or explainer	82	6	2026-09-15
Report or ebook	72	0	2025-12-02
Webinar or virtual event	45	2	2026-08-27
News or press	44	0	2026-05-27
Conference or event	39	0	2025-09-05
Podcast or video	25	0	2025-02-06
Case study	6	0	2025-10-16

Most recent

2026-09-29Verified partners blog
2026-09-28Start an llc from overseas blog
2026-09-28Kevin usuga blog
2026-09-26Neobank blueprint blog
2026-09-23Embedded finance statistics blog
2026-09-23Online business ideas blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page whop.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Whop

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Whop is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Whop is the place for business operators. Scale up customer acquisition and distribute your products with a few clicks. Spin up an empire in an afternoon.
whop.com
For: business operators
whop.com
Price stated: Standard Pricing: Pay-as-you-go. No setup fees, no monthly costs. 2.7%+$0.30 for every successful card transaction. Custom Pricing: Tailored rates for high-volume businesses. whop.com/network/pricing
Starting price: 2.7%+$0.30 whop.com/network/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get started for free whop.com/network/pricing
Integrations claimed: 10 whop.com/network/pricing
Customers named: micro1InstinctSideShiftSales MomentumBAD Marketing
Not stated on the pages read: Certifications, hosting

What Whop's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: whop.com, whop.com/network/pricing, whop.com/network/products/payouts, whop.com/network/product/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Whop's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Whop, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Whop by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Whop is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Whop, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.