Every category where a model named Worksuite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	2%	11 of 83	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Worksuite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Worksuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels2

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative19 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Comprehensive, all-in-one platform for onboarding, compliance, and payments, ideal for global teams with complex needs.” Mistral Small · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · first choice

“Deel, Remote, and Worksuite are the most comprehensive all‑in‑one choices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best all-in-one global platform: Deel or Worksuite.” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · first choice

“Worksuite - Best Overall for Mid-Market” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contractor payments · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Worksuite, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Worksuite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Deel44 of 5216Not in the top three

Tipalti36 of 526Not in the top three

Remote30 of 521Not in the top three

Rippling26 of 522Not in the top three

Papaya Global24 of 528Not in the top three

Gusto24 of 527Not in the top three

Wingspan17 of 522Not in the top three

Wise Business16 of 520Not in the top three

Routable14 of 525Not in the top three

Payoneer11 of 520Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Worksuite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 52 answers that named Worksuite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worksuite.comYour site41

remote.com33

contractor-of-record.com29

guideflow.com26

learn.g2.com26

wingspan.app22

papayaglobal.com19

deel.com16

routable.com15

wise.com14

200 of the 241 domain citations in answers naming Worksuite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software37

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools31

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts28

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software24

guideflow.com/blog/contractor-payment-software23

wingspan.app/articles/best-contractor-payroll-services19

papayaglobal.com/blog/10-best-contractor-payment-software16

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-management-platforms12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Worksuite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Worksuite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Worksuite Global Pay 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Worksuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Worksuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at worksuite.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.