AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Equity and corporate › Board portals › BoardPro vs Nasdaq Boardvantage
Board portals · October 2026 Edition

BoardPro vs Nasdaq Boardvantage

Zero of fourteen models named BoardPro first on the direct prompt; zero named Nasdaq Boardvantage. Both were named by all fourteen models and BoardPro carries 32 labels and Nasdaq Boardvantage 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardPro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Nasdaq Boardvantage

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3228A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardPro reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardPro · OnBoard vs Nasdaq Boardvantage · Boardable vs BoardPro

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board portals page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardProFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNasdaq Boardvantage
Direct001 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Paraphrase112 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Comparative041 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Budget-constrained202 against BoardPro
Scale-constrained001 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Negative003 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, BoardPro and Nasdaq Boardvantage were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 180 answers naming BoardPro and the 203 naming Nasdaq Boardvantage. In those answers Nasdaq Boardvantage took the first choice four times and BoardPro twenty-five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardPro and Nasdaq Boardvantage stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardPro Nasdaq Boardvantage first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardPro on the left and Nasdaq Boardvantage on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardPro and Nasdaq Boardvantage stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Boardable, Diligent Boards
Gemini 3.5 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Mistral SmallOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, BoardPro, Govenda
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Govenda
GLM 4.7 FlashXOnBoard alternatives: BoardPro

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Azeus Convene, Diligent Boards
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Govenda
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard
Qwen 3.7 FlashAprio Board Portal alternatives: AppDeck, OnBoard
Kimi K2Govenda, OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
MiniMax M2.5Aprio Board Portal, OnBoard
GPT-6 LunaOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardPro leads by fifty-four points.
BoardPro54%#1 of 8
Nasdaq Boardvantage0%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardPro leads by four points.
BoardPro6%#3 of 10
Nasdaq Boardvantage2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Nasdaq Boardvantage leads at enterprise.
Nasdaq Boardvantage19%#2 of 10
BoardPro6%#4 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardPro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Cheaper and better-rated for small users than competitors like BoardPro ($165+/month per board, flat rate but higher entry)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“still relatively affordable but less budget-focused than Boardable” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you have a large board (12+ members): Go with BoardPro. Its flat-rate "per board" pricing model with unlimited users will save you a fortune” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company board, I'd start with BoardPro Essentials if you have 7 or more people who need access.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Enterprise-grade pricing (~$20K–40K+/year) — designed for regulated public companies” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“avoiding the excessive price tags and bloated complexity of legacy enterprise portals built for massive public corporations (like Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Public/enterprise companies → Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (premium, security-first, enterprise scale)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“choose Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage for large, regulated enterprises needing deep compliance and analytics” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“For enterprise-scale governance, start with Diligent Boards and Nasdaq Boardvantage.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.