Every category where a model named BoardPro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	7%	5 of 97	0%	22	accepted challenger
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	34 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for BoardPro yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated BoardPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	2	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	3
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels4

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative14 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels9

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative8 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative62 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want the best value with more features: BoardPro offers the best balance of price and functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · Board · budget prompt · first choice

“Best overall for SMBs; repeatable board packs with controlled approvals and audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

“For most companies on a tight budget, BoardPro is the sweet spot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · budget prompt · first choice

“best value pick is usually BoardPro or Decisions” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as BoardPro, over the 62 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BoardPro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OnBoard37 of 625Compare →

Boardable36 of 6211Compare →

AppDeck Board Portal29 of 624Not in the top three

Nasdaq Boardvantage28 of 622Not in the top three

Diligent22 of 622Not in the top three

Diligent Boards22 of 622Not in the top three

Planful13 of 620Not in the top three

Govenda12 of 621Not in the top three

Azeus Convene11 of 620Not in the top three

BoardEffect11 of 620Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BoardPro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 62 answers that named BoardPro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdeck.com45

board-room.org33

clearpointstrategy.com32

guideflow.com28

worldmetrics.org27

g2.com26

capterra.com24

gitnux.org21

fast.io20

getaleph.com20

276 of the 276 domain citations in answers naming BoardPro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison39

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202634

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software32

guideflow.com/blog/board-management-software28

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software27

getaleph.com/answers/board-investor-reporting-software20

gitnux.org/best/board-reporting-software18

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as BoardPro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as BoardPro; a claim can dispute any of them.

BoardPro/Govenda 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BoardPro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BoardPro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at board.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.