Every category where a model named Nasdaq Boardvantage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	5%	6 of 97	35%	26	criticized challenger
Entity management	Equity and corporate	0%	86 of 87	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nasdaq Boardvantage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nasdaq Boardvantage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	2	3
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Kimi K2	1	0	0	2	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct28 labels11

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative26 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained13 labelsNone

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative87 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice.” Mistral Small · Board · direct prompt · first choice

“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration” Kimi K2 · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best for large enterprise governance: Diligent Boards or Nasdaq Boardvantage.” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · Board · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Board · direct prompt · hard negative

“it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · direct prompt · soft negative

“avoiding traditional enterprise portals (such as Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage)... $5,000 to $15,000+ per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nasdaq Boardvantage, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nasdaq Boardvantage was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OnBoard53 of 8712Not in the top three

Diligent Boards50 of 877Not in the top three

Boardable34 of 876Not in the top three

BoardPro28 of 878Not in the top three

BoardEffect28 of 871Not in the top three

Azeus Convene27 of 870Not in the top three

Diligent25 of 870Not in the top three

AppDeck Board Portal21 of 873Not in the top three

Board Intelligence21 of 870Not in the top three

Govenda19 of 872Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nasdaq Boardvantage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 87 answers that named Nasdaq Boardvantage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org55

appdeck.com53

board-room.org42

clearpointstrategy.com39

getaleph.com35

g2.com31

fast.io27

boardintelligence.com25

gitnux.org24

getfairview.com22

353 of the 353 domain citations in answers naming Nasdaq Boardvantage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison47

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software46

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software39

getaleph.com/answers/board-investor-reporting-software35

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software30

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software28

appdeck.com/blog/board-portal-software-comparison-202624

getfairview.com/best/board-reporting-software21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Nasdaq Boardvantage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nasdaq Boardvantage; a claim can dispute any of them.

Boardvantage 1Boardvantage (Nasdaq) 1Deloitte’s Boardvantage 1Diligent / Nasdaq Boardvantage 1Nasdaq BoardPortal 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nasdaq Boardvantage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nasdaq Boardvantage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nasdaq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.