AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Board › BoardSpace vs Board Intelligence
Board and investor reporting · October 2026 Edition

BoardSpace vs Board Intelligence

Zero of fourteen models named BoardSpace first on the direct prompt; zero named Board Intelligence. BoardSpace was named by nine of the fourteen models and Board Intelligence by thirteen and BoardSpace carries 10 labels and Board Intelligence 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BoardSpace

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Board Intelligence

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels1020A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BoardSpace reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs BoardSpace · OnBoard vs Board Intelligence · Boardable vs BoardSpace

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardSpaceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoard Intelligence
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative02
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained01
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BoardSpace and Board Intelligence stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BoardSpace Board Intelligence first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardSpace on the left and Board Intelligence on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BoardSpace and Board Intelligence stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDatarails, Mosaic alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Cube, OnBoard
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppDeck Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Govenda
GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Boards alternatives: BoardPaq, Boardable, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Mistral SmallGovenda, OnBoard alternatives: Boardable, ClearPoint Strategy
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Boardable, Govenda
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard alternatives: Kluster
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Kluster
Kimi K2OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage, Zeck
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard, Prophix alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Boardable
GPT-6 LunaCube alternatives: Jirav, OnBoard
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoardSpace leads by two points.
BoardSpace2%#– of 8
Board Intelligence0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BoardSpace leads by two points.
BoardSpace4%#4 of 8
Board Intelligence2%#5 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BoardSpace is not named for this buyer.
Board Intelligence4%#5 of 7
BoardSpace—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BoardSpace

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“It is often cited as one of the most accessible options for smaller organizations... Starting around $69 per month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable or BoardSpace would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Board Intelligence

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Choose Board Intelligence if your priority is better board papers, structured reporting, and AI-assisted insight generation.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Need help writing better board papers? Start with Board Intelligence.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“Board Intelligence — strong for report quality and AI insights” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.