Every category where a model named Board Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	22 of 97	8%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Board Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Board Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“focuses on AI-powered automation for minute writing and board reporting, with a focus on mid-market organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“Board Intelligence is a premium option focused on helping management teams actually write *better* board reports.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · direct prompt · alternative

“Board Intelligence actually helps executives write shorter, sharper, and more strategic board papers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if you want easier board reporting and reporting packs: Board Intelligence” GPT-5.4 mini · Board · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“far out of budget. Skip these unless you're a large public company.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Board · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Board Intelligence, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Board Intelligence was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OnBoard22 of 316Not in the top three

Nasdaq Boardvantage21 of 319Not in the top three

Diligent Boards19 of 318Not in the top three

Azeus Convene12 of 310Not in the top three

Boardable10 of 312Not in the top three

BoardEffect9 of 311Not in the top three

Govenda9 of 311Not in the top three

BoardPro8 of 312Not in the top three

Datarails8 of 310Not in the top three

Diligent6 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Board Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 31 answers that named Board Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

boardintelligence.com18

appdeck.com17

worldmetrics.org17

clearpointstrategy.com15

gitnux.org15

board-room.org12

learn.g2.com11

g2.com10

fast.io9

gartner.com9

133 of the 133 domain citations in answers naming Board Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clearpointstrategy.com/blog/board-reporting-software15

worldmetrics.org/best/board-reporting-software14

appdeck.com/blog/board-reporting-software-comparison13

board-room.org/blog/board-reporting-software12

learn.g2.com/best-board-management-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/board-report-software10

boardintelligence.com/blog/what-is-the-best-board-management-software-for-large-organizati9

boardintelligence.com/blog/which-board-management-software-is-best-for-improving-board-rep9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Board Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Board Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at board.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.