AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Planning and analysis › Board › Boardable vs BoardSpace
Board and investor reporting · October 2026 Edition

Boardable vs BoardSpace

Zero of fourteen models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; zero named BoardSpace. Boardable was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and BoardSpace by nine and Boardable carries 40 labels and BoardSpace 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Boardable

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

BoardSpace

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share13%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#4A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels4010A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Boardable reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. OnBoard vs Boardable · OnBoard vs BoardSpace · Boardable vs BoardPro

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardableFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoardSpace
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained72
Scale-constrained001 against Boardable
Negative001 against Boardable
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Boardable and BoardSpace were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 207 answers naming Boardable and the 37 naming BoardSpace. In those answers BoardSpace took the first choice five times and Boardable sixteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Boardable and BoardSpace stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Boardable BoardSpace first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Boardable on the left and BoardSpace on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Boardable and BoardSpace stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Boards alternatives: BoardPaq, Boardable, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Govenda
Mistral SmallGovenda, OnBoard alternatives: Boardable, ClearPoint Strategy
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Boardable, Govenda
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard, Prophix alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Boardable
Muse Glimmer 30BOnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Boardable, Cube, Datarails, Planful, Prophix

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Govenda
Gemini 3.5 FlashDatarails, Mosaic alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Cube, OnBoard
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Llama 4 MaverickOnBoard alternatives: Kluster
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Kluster
Kimi K2OnBoard alternatives: Diligent Boards, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage, Zeck
GLM 4.7 FlashXAppDeck Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards
GPT-6 LunaCube alternatives: Jirav, OnBoard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Boardable leads by eight points.
Boardable10%#3 of 8
BoardSpace2%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Boardable leads by nine points.
Boardable13%#2 of 8
BoardSpace4%#4 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
BoardSpace is not named for this buyer.
Boardable0%#7 of 7
BoardSpace—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Boardable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“A popular low-cost option for nonprofits, but it has a critical blind spot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Budget-friendly ... but better suited to smaller nonprofits.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best board reporting software for a company with a limited budget is Boardable, which is purpose-built for nonprofit boards at $20.99 per user per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Recommendation: Start with Boardable if you need polished reporting features without breaking the bank—it's the most accessible for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“For most companies with a limited budget, Boardable offers the best balance of features, pricing transparency, and ease of use.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about BoardSpace

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“It is often cited as one of the most accessible options for smaller organizations... Starting around $69 per month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable or BoardSpace would be the top recommendations” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.