Index › Planning and analysis › Corporate performance ma › Cube vs Jedox

Corporate performance management · September 2026 Edition

Cube vs Jedox

Zero of twelve models named Cube first on the direct prompt; zero named Jedox. Cube was named by eight of the twelve models and Jedox by ten and Cube carries 14 labels and Jedox 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cube

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Jedox

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels1415A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cube reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Planful vs Cube · Planful vs Jedox · Vena vs Cube

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate performance management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

CubeFirst choices, of twelve modelsJedox

Direct00

Paraphrase00

Comparative00

Budget-constrained21

Scale-constrained00

Negative001 against Jedox

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cube and Jedox stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Cube

Jedox

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cube on the left and Jedox on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cube and Jedox stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Gemini 3.5 FlashPigment alternatives: Cube, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Mistral SmallPlanful alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Prophix

DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Kimi K2Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, OneStream, Vena

MiniMax M2.5Pigment, Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix

Grok 4.1 FastPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Vena

Llama 4 MaverickPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning, deFacto Global

Qwen 3.7 FlashSonar alternatives: Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Vena

GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix alternatives: Drivetrain, Limelight, Planful, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Cube leads by sixteen points.

Cube#1 of 11

Jedox#– of 11

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Cube leads by two points.

Cube#6 of 12

Jedox#7 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

Cube#– of 12

Jedox#– of 12

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cube

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Jedox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Flexibility can lead to complex implementations; limited formatted reporting capabilities” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative

“Jedox and Small Improvements are the top recommendations. Jedox is ideal for financial planning and analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

“Has a published entry tier ("Essential," ... so costs are more transparent than quote-only competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers affordable subscription plans - Good for small businesses needing budgeting & forecasting” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative

Also compared

Planful vs Cube Planful vs Jedox Vena vs Cube Vena vs Jedox Prophix vs Cube Prophix vs Jedox Workday Adaptive Planning vs Cube Workday Adaptive Planning vs Jedox Pigment vs Cube Pigment vs Jedox Cube vs Anaplan Jedox vs Anaplan All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full corporate performance ma standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.