6 categories · RankedJedox
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 2% | 8 of 95 | 7% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 28 of 114 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 72 of 97 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Financial consolidation | Accounting and close | 0% | 79 of 96 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 75 of 133 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 0% | 40 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Jedox and Small Improvements are the top recommendations. Jedox is ideal for financial planning and analysis” Mistral Small · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · first choice
“Has a published entry tier ("Essential," ... so costs are more transparent than quote-only competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
“Offers affordable subscription plans - Good for small businesses needing budgeting & forecasting” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose Vena or Jedox if your team wants an Excel-friendly experience” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate performance ma · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Flexibility can lead to complex implementations; limited formatted reporting capabilities” Kimi K2 · Corporate performance ma · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 44 answers that named Jedox and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
143 of the 143 domain citations in answers naming Jedox came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jedox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jedox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jedox.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.