Index › Planning and analysis › Corporate performance ma › Prophix vs Jedox

Corporate performance management · September 2026 Edition

Prophix vs Jedox

Four of twelve models named Prophix first on the direct prompt; zero named Jedox. Prophix was named by nine of the twelve models and Jedox by ten and Prophix carries 23 labels and Jedox 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Prophix

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Jedox

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share12%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate9%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels2315A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Prophix reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Planful vs Prophix · Planful vs Jedox · Vena vs Prophix

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate performance management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

ProphixFirst choices, of twelve modelsJedox

Direct40

Paraphrase10

Comparative00

Budget-constrained01

Scale-constrained00

Negative002 against Prophix · 1 against Jedox

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Prophix and Jedox stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Prophix

Jedox

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Prophix on the left and Jedox on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Prophix and Jedox stood in it.

Prophix first, Jedox not the choice

4 of 12 modelsJedox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Kimi K2Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, OneStream, Vena

GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix alternatives: Drivetrain, Limelight, Planful, Vena

MiniMax M2.5Pigment, Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Workday Adaptive Planning

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Gemini 3.5 FlashPigment alternatives: Cube, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix

Grok 4.1 FastPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Vena

Mistral SmallPlanful alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Prophix

Llama 4 MaverickPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning, deFacto Global

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Qwen 3.7 FlashSonar alternatives: Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Vena

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Prophix leads by four points.

Prophix#6 of 11

Jedox#– of 11

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Prophix leads by ten points.

Prophix#3 of 12

Jedox#7 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

Prophix#– of 12

Jedox#– of 12

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Prophix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“1. Prophix One™ – Best for Planning + Financial Close in One Platform ... Designed specifically for mid-market organizations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jedox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Flexibility can lead to complex implementations; limited formatted reporting capabilities” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative

“Jedox and Small Improvements are the top recommendations. Jedox is ideal for financial planning and analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

“Has a published entry tier ("Essential," ... so costs are more transparent than quote-only competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers affordable subscription plans - Good for small businesses needing budgeting & forecasting” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative

Also compared

Planful vs Prophix Planful vs Jedox Vena vs Prophix Vena vs Jedox Prophix vs Workday Adaptive Planning Prophix vs Pigment Prophix vs Cube Prophix vs Anaplan Workday Adaptive Planning vs Jedox Pigment vs Jedox Cube vs Jedox Jedox vs Anaplan All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full corporate performance ma standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.