AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Receivables and billing › Ecommerce fraud › Eftsure vs NoFraud
Ecommerce fraud prevention · October 2026 Edition

Eftsure vs NoFraud

Zero of fourteen models named Eftsure first on the direct prompt; zero named NoFraud. Eftsure was named by eleven of the fourteen models and NoFraud by twelve and Eftsure carries 16 labels and NoFraud 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Eftsure

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

NoFraud

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share16%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels1623A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Eftsure reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Signifyd was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. SEON vs Eftsure · SEON vs NoFraud · Eftsure vs Stripe Radar

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
EftsureFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNoFraud
Direct00
Paraphrase80
Comparative00
Budget-constrained041 against NoFraud
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against NoFraud
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Eftsure and NoFraud stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Eftsure NoFraud first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Eftsure on the left and NoFraud on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Eftsure and NoFraud stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallSignifyd alternatives: NoFraud, Sift
Llama 4 MaverickWyllo alternatives: NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Signifyd, cside
Kimi K2SEON alternatives: Eftsure, Kount, Trustmi
GLM 4.7 FlashXSignifyd alternatives: ClearSale, Eftsure, SEON, Sift
Muse Glimmer 30BSignifyd, Wyllo, formerly NoFraud alternatives: Eftsure, SEON

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5FraudNet, Trustmi alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
GPT-5.4 miniSift alternatives: Forter, Kount, Signifyd
Gemini 3.5 FlashSEON alternatives: Allianz Trade Pay, Sift, Signifyd, TreviPay
Perplexity SonarSEON alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
Grok 4.1 FastSift alternatives: Chargeflow, Fingerprint, SEON, Signifyd, Wyllo
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON alternatives: Sift, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
Qwen 3.7 FlashSignifyd alternatives: Fingerprint, Kount
MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, SEON alternatives: Forter, Riskified
GPT-6 LunaSEON alternatives: Kount

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
NoFraud leads by thirty-four points.
NoFraud34%#1 of 12
Eftsure0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Eftsure leads at mid-market.
Eftsure16%#2 of 11
NoFraud8%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Eftsure leads by two points.
Eftsure2%#– of 9
NoFraud0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Eftsure

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Best for Preventing B2B Payment Fraud (Vendor/Invoice Fraud) ... Eftsure ... Designed specifically for mid-to-large enterprises managing complex vendor ecosystems.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Eftsure is the most specialized and highly recommended due to its real-time vendor validation, B2B focus, and financial guarantee.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Eftsure or Trustmi since they're specifically built for B2B payment fraud use cases.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about NoFraud

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“NoFraud is the one I'd most strongly caution against for smaller merchants, based on the 1.8/5 Trustpilot score” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its paid starter plans begin at $250/month, so they may not suit a very limited budget.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Examples of platforms using this model: Riskified, Signifyd, ClearSale, NoFraud” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a company with a limited budget is NoFraud for Shopify merchants” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most budget-friendly options, start with NoFraud (free Lite tier, $250/month)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“NoFraud is widely considered the best value platform for growth-stage businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.