Zero of fourteen models named NoFraud first on the direct prompt; two named Sift. NoFraud was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Sift by fourteen and NoFraud carries 23 labels and Sift 44, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, NoFraud and Sift were named in the same answer forty-five times, of the 79 answers naming NoFraud and the 161 naming Sift. In those answers Sift took the first choice four times and NoFraud twenty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“NoFraud is the one I'd most strongly caution against for smaller merchants, based on the 1.8/5 Trustpilot score” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its paid starter plans begin at $250/month, so they may not suit a very limited budget.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Examples of platforms using this model: Riskified, Signifyd, ClearSale, NoFraud” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a company with a limited budget is NoFraud for Shopify merchants” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most budget-friendly options, start with NoFraud (free Lite tier, $250/month)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“NoFraud is widely considered the best value platform for growth-stage businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Can be complex to configure; occasional false positives requiring manual review. Not ideal for very small teams due to setup overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike consumer-focused tools (like Sift or Stripe Radar), these are specifically designed for B2B payment workflows” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Some users note that the system can occasionally generate false positives, which may require additional review time.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Sift for most mid-market B2B ecommerce—it's consistently #1 in G2 rankings for balanced performance without overkill.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Sift maintains #1 position across all fraud prevention categories in G2's Fall 2025 Reports” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Sift - Top-rated on G2 for real-time detection.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.