AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Receivables and billing › Ecommerce fraud › Signifyd vs NoFraud
Ecommerce fraud prevention · October 2026 Edition

Signifyd vs NoFraud

Four of fourteen models named Signifyd first on the direct prompt; zero named NoFraud. Signifyd was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and NoFraud by twelve and Signifyd carries 43 labels and NoFraud 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Signifyd

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

NoFraud

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4323A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Signifyd reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.SEON was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. SEON vs Signifyd · SEON vs NoFraud · Eftsure vs Signifyd

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the ecommerce fraud prevention page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SignifydFirst choices, of fourteen modelsNoFraud
Direct401 against Signifyd
Paraphrase00
Comparative60
Budget-constrained042 against Signifyd · 1 against NoFraud
Scale-constrained00
Negative005 against Signifyd · 2 against NoFraud
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Signifyd and NoFraud were named in the same answer fifty-two times, of the 198 answers naming Signifyd and the 79 naming NoFraud. In those answers NoFraud took the first choice twenty-one times and Signifyd five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Signifyd and NoFraud stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Signifyd NoFraud first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Signifyd on the left and NoFraud on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Signifyd and NoFraud stood in it.

Signifyd first, NoFraud an alternative

4 of 14 modelsNoFraud was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallSignifyd alternatives: NoFraud, Sift
Qwen 3.7 FlashSignifyd alternatives: Fingerprint, Kount
GLM 4.7 FlashXSignifyd alternatives: ClearSale, Eftsure, SEON, Sift
Muse Glimmer 30BSignifyd, Wyllo, formerly NoFraud alternatives: Eftsure, SEON

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5FraudNet, Trustmi alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
GPT-5.4 miniSift alternatives: Forter, Kount, Signifyd
Gemini 3.5 FlashSEON alternatives: Allianz Trade Pay, Sift, Signifyd, TreviPay
Perplexity SonarSEON alternatives: Kount, Sift, Signifyd
Grok 4.1 FastSift alternatives: Chargeflow, Fingerprint, SEON, Signifyd, Wyllo
DeepSeek V4 FlashSEON alternatives: Sift, Signifyd, Stripe Radar
Llama 4 MaverickWyllo alternatives: NoFraud, SEON, Sift, Signifyd, cside

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Kimi K2SEON alternatives: Eftsure, Kount, Trustmi
MiniMax M2.5ClearSale, SEON alternatives: Forter, Riskified
GPT-6 LunaSEON alternatives: Kount

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
NoFraud leads by twenty-seven points.
NoFraud34%#1 of 12
Signifyd7%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Signifyd8%#4 of 11
NoFraud8%#5 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Signifyd leads at enterprise.
Signifyd20%#2 of 9
NoFraud0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Signifyd

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Signifyd's public terms define eligible chargebacks narrowly... That's a reason to get the exact coverage schedule and exclusions in the signed agreement—not, by itself, a reason to avoid Signifyd.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Signifyd or Riskified if: You want to outsource fraud completely... Go with Signifyd if you are mid-market and want seamless e-commerce platform plug-ins.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“The original "chargeback guarantee" pioneer ... Best fit: High-volume merchants ($10M+ GMV) who want fraud completely off their plate.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall (Especially for Open Credit): Signifyd ... widely considered the gold standard for B2B commerce” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about NoFraud

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“NoFraud is the one I'd most strongly caution against for smaller merchants, based on the 1.8/5 Trustpilot score” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Its paid starter plans begin at $250/month, so they may not suit a very limited budget.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“Examples of platforms using this model: Riskified, Signifyd, ClearSale, NoFraud” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best ecommerce fraud prevention platform for a company with a limited budget is NoFraud for Shopify merchants” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most budget-friendly options, start with NoFraud (free Lite tier, $250/month)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“NoFraud is widely considered the best value platform for growth-stage businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.