Navan vs SAP Concur
Two of twelve models named Navan first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Concur. Navan was named by eleven of the twelve models and SAP Concur by twelve and Navan carries 29 labels and SAP Concur 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the expense management page.
By framing
NavanFirst choices, of twelve modelsSAP Concur
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Navan and SAP Concur were named in the same answer 198 times, of the 286 answers naming Navan and the 385 naming SAP Concur. In those answers SAP Concur took the first choice forty times and Navan forty-six.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Navan SAP Concur first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Navan on the left and SAP Concur on the right.The direct prompt
Navan first, SAP Concur an alternative
2 of 12 modelsSAP Concur was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Navan0%#– of 7SAP Concur0%#7 of 7SAP Concur66%#1 of 9Navan3%#6 of 9What the models said about Navan
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Navan consistently ranks as the top all-in-one travel and expense platform, with leading scores for overall satisfaction, ease of use” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about SAP Concur
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“The most frequently criticized option among users, with consistent themes across G2 and Trustpilot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spendesk, Expensify, SAP Concur, or Rippling Spend are often cited as top recommendations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SAP Concur and Navan lead for large enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.