Finance AI Index
Index Spend and procurement Expense management › Ramp vs SAP Concur
Expense management · September 2026 Edition

Ramp vs SAP Concur

Seven of twelve models named Ramp first on the direct prompt; zero named SAP Concur. Both were named by all twelve models and Ramp carries 52 labels and SAP Concur 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Ramp

endorsed leader

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

SAP Concur

criticized challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share34%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%32%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5240A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Ramp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Navan was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Ramp vs Zoho Expense · Ramp vs Spendesk · Ramp vs Rippling Spend

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the expense management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
RampFirst choices, of twelve modelsSAP Concur
Direct701 against SAP Concur
Paraphrase612 against SAP Concur
Comparative51
Budget-constrained202 against SAP Concur
Scale-constrained102 against SAP Concur
Negative203 against Ramp · 6 against SAP Concur
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Ramp and SAP Concur were named in the same answer 222 times, of the 944 answers naming Ramp and the 385 naming SAP Concur. In those answers SAP Concur took the first choice thirty-one times and Ramp fifty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Ramp and SAP Concur stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Ramp SAP Concur first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ramp on the left and SAP Concur on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Ramp and SAP Concur stood in it.

Ramp first, SAP Concur an alternative

7 of 12 modelsSAP Concur was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashRamp alternatives: Airbase, Brex, Navan, Rippling Spend
Perplexity SonarRamp alternatives: Airbase, Expensify, Navan, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Grok 4.1 FastRamp alternatives: Navan, SAP Concur
DeepSeek V4 FlashRamp alternatives: Airwallex, Brex, Navan, SAP Concur
Qwen 3.7 FlashRamp alternatives: Navan, SAP Concur, Spendesk
Kimi K2Navan, Ramp alternatives: Expensify, Rippling Spend
GLM 4.7 FlashXRamp alternatives: Expensify, Navan, Paylocity, SAP Concur

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Navan alternatives: Ramp, SAP Concur
GPT-5.4 miniRippling Spend alternatives: Navan, SAP Concur
Mistral SmallSpendesk alternatives: Emburse, Procurify, Ramp
MiniMax M2.5Rippling Spend alternatives: Airbase, Emburse, Navan, SAP Concur

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Ramp leads by twenty-three points.
Ramp23%#2 of 7
SAP Concur0%#7 of 7
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Ramp leads by thirty-two points.
Ramp34%#1 of 11
SAP Concur2%#8 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: SAP Concur leads at enterprise.
SAP Concur66%#1 of 9
Ramp11%#2 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Ramp

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about SAP Concur

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“The most frequently criticized option among users, with consistent themes across G2 and Trustpilot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Spendesk, Expensify, SAP Concur, or Rippling Spend are often cited as top recommendations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“SAP Concur and Navan lead for large enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.