Nine of twelve models named Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision first on the direct prompt; three named Bloomberg Tax Provision. Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision was named by twelve of the twelve models and Bloomberg Tax Provision by eleven and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision carries 33 labels and Bloomberg Tax Provision 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate tax provision page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“mid-market enterprises or lean tax teams (fewer than 5–10 people) should approach them with caution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“these systems may represent more cost, complexity, and implementation friction than you need” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“routinely costs between $50,000 and $100,000+ annually in licensing and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, ONESOURCE Tax Provision is the safest choice due to its balance of power, audit readiness, and scalability.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Leading solution for automating ASC 740 tax provision calculations, ETR analysis, and financial disclosures with robust integrations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“OTP is the market-heavyweight software.... Best For: Large, multinational corporations seeking an end-to-end global tax ecosystem.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Bloomberg Tax Provision: An enterprise-grade platform with high implementation overhead.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“significantly cheaper than enterprise solutions like Bloomberg (often $50k-$100k+)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Deep analytics, but lighter on full compliance | Costly for pure filing needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Frequently the "go-to" for mid-market companies. It is highly regarded for its transparent calculations (no black box), rapid implementation, and excellent customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you want the absolute best mix of rapid setup (<2 months), robust calculation, and intuitive interface, choose Bloomberg Tax Provision.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Corptax or Bloomberg if you need comprehensive enterprise-grade automation with the highest audit standards” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.