Nine of twelve models named Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision first on the direct prompt; one named Longview Tax. Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision was named by twelve of the twelve models and Longview Tax by eleven and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision carries 33 labels and Longview Tax 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate tax provision page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision and Longview Tax were named in the same answer forty-four times, of the 82 answers naming Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision and the 65 naming Longview Tax. In those answers Longview Tax took the first choice zero times and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“mid-market enterprises or lean tax teams (fewer than 5–10 people) should approach them with caution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“these systems may represent more cost, complexity, and implementation friction than you need” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“routinely costs between $50,000 and $100,000+ annually in licensing and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, ONESOURCE Tax Provision is the safest choice due to its balance of power, audit readiness, and scalability.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Leading solution for automating ASC 740 tax provision calculations, ETR analysis, and financial disclosures with robust integrations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“OTP is the market-heavyweight software.... Best For: Large, multinational corporations seeking an end-to-end global tax ecosystem.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid: Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Quote-based (typically high) | Enterprise CPM platform” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Tier-1 enterprise software...routinely costs between $50,000 and $100,000+ annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Longview Tax is generally considered the strongest "middle ground" solution to escape the spreadsheet trap without breaking the bank” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“OneStream and Longview Tax are frequently recommended as they balance cost with essential features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The Sweet Spot for Most Mid-Market Companies: Longview Tax” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.