Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Bloomberg Tax Provision · September 2026 Edition
Bloomberg Tax · 1 category · Ranked

Bloomberg Tax Provision

116Judge labels
12First choices
24Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
14% in Corporate tax provision for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 43 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bloomberg Tax Provision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance10%2 of 9814%43accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bloomberg Tax Provision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bloomberg Tax Provision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503003
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash32005
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast02327
Mistral Small01012
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash02114
Kimi K211204
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.510416

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels7
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative32 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained26 labels2
Scale-constrained13 labels3
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative116 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Frequently the "go-to" for mid-market companies. It is highly regarded for its transparent calculations (no black box), rapid implementation, and excellent customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · scale prompt · first choice
“If you want the absolute best mix of rapid setup (<2 months), robust calculation, and intuitive interface, choose Bloomberg Tax Provision.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Corptax or Bloomberg if you need comprehensive enterprise-grade automation with the highest audit standards” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · first choice
“look into modern, agile alternatives like Bloomberg Tax Provision, Longview Tax, or Exactera” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Bloomberg Tax Provision: An enterprise-grade platform with high implementation overhead.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“significantly cheaper than enterprise solutions like Bloomberg (often $50k-$100k+)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · soft negative
“Deep analytics, but lighter on full compliance | Costly for pure filing needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“industry leaders but are enterprise-priced ($800+/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bloomberg Tax Provision, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bloomberg Tax Provision was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Longview Tax50 of 1003Not in the top three
CSC Corptax43 of 1002Not in the top three
Sovos Tax Provision37 of 1004Not in the top three
Oracle Tax Reporting18 of 1000Not in the top three
Workiva17 of 1003Not in the top three
CCH Tagetik16 of 1001Not in the top three
Vertex12 of 1000Not in the top three
OneStream11 of 1001Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bloomberg Tax Provision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 87 of the 100 answers that named Bloomberg Tax Provision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org72
zipdo.co65
gitnux.org63
wifitalents.com60
pro.bloombergtax.comYour site56
tax.thomsonreuters.com41
rightworks.com34
cbh.com31
gartner.com28
wolterskluwer.com26

420 of the 476 domain citations in answers naming Bloomberg Tax Provision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Bloomberg Tax Provision

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bloomberg Tax Provision; a claim can dispute any of them.
TaxStream 6Bloomberg Tax 4Bloomberg 3TaxStream (Thomson Reuters) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bloomberg Tax Provision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bloomberg Tax Provision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bloombergtax.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack