Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Longview Tax · September 2026 Edition
Longview · 1 category · Ranked

Longview Tax

65Judge labels
4First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Corporate tax provision for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 98 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 28 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Longview Tax for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance7%4 of 9818%28accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Longview Tax yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Longview Tax across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash04015
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00213
Mistral Small11013
DeepSeek V4 Flash03014
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash20103
Kimi K202013
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct18 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels3
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative65 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Longview Tax is generally considered the strongest "middle ground" solution to escape the spreadsheet trap without breaking the bank” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice
“OneStream and Longview Tax are frequently recommended as they balance cost with essential features” Mistral Small · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice
“The Sweet Spot for Most Mid-Market Companies: Longview Tax” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · first choice
“it's worth also looking at Longview Tax and CCH Axcess/ProSystem fx tax provision offerings in a shortlist process” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“Quote-based (typically high) | Enterprise CPM platform” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“Tier-1 enterprise software...routinely costs between $50,000 and $100,000+ annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · soft negative
“Good for consolidation features, though some users find the interface dated.” Mistral Small · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Longview Tax, over the 65 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Longview Tax was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bloomberg Tax Provision50 of 657Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision44 of 6529Not in the top three
CSC Corptax32 of 654Not in the top three
Sovos Tax Provision29 of 655Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE18 of 651Not in the top three
Oracle Tax Reporting15 of 650Not in the top three
CCH Tagetik10 of 650Not in the top three
Vertex9 of 650Not in the top three
Workiva9 of 650Not in the top three
OneStream Tax Provision8 of 650Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Longview Tax. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 65 answers that named Longview Tax and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org44
zipdo.co44
gitnux.org40
wifitalents.com34
pro.bloombergtax.com28
tax.thomsonreuters.com26
cbh.com21
rightworks.com20
houseblend.io18
statwharf.com17

292 of the 292 domain citations in answers naming Longview Tax came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Longview Tax

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Longview Tax; a claim can dispute any of them.
Longview Tax (insightsoftware) 3Longview 2Longview Tax (by insightsoftware) 2InsightSoftware (Longview Tax) 1Longview Tax (Insightsoftware) 1Longview Tax (Longview Systems / OneStream) 1Longview Tax Provision 1insightsoftware Longview Tax 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Longview Tax's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Longview Tax, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at longview.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack