Hyperproof vs Workiva
Zero of twelve models named Hyperproof first on the direct prompt; one named Workiva. Hyperproof was named by eight of the twelve models and Workiva by twelve and Hyperproof carries 16 labels and Workiva 33, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.
By framing
HyperproofFirst choices, of twelve modelsWorkiva
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Hyperproof Workiva first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Hyperproof on the left and Workiva on the right.The direct prompt
Workiva first, Hyperproof not the choice
1 of 12 modelsHyperproof was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Hyperproof10%#2 of 13Workiva2%#9 of 13Workiva12%#3 of 11Hyperproof0%#– of 11What the models said about Hyperproof
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“quote-based platforms (e.g., Drata ~$7.5K-$25K/year, Hyperproof $12K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Hyperproof: ~$41,000/year ... you should avoid them” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Hyperproof is the best balance of cost, ease of use, and feature depth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LogicGate or Hyperproof are the strongest value picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If the IT Security / Engineering team owns ITGCs and you also need SOC 2: Go with Hyperproof or Scytale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Workiva
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Workiva, AuditBoard, LogicGate – Overkill, quote-only, and almost always over $40k/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.