Internal controls and SOX · September 2026 Edition
Diligent One Platform vs Hyperproof
Zero of twelve models named Diligent One Platform first on the direct prompt; zero named Hyperproof. Diligent One Platform was named by ten of the twelve models and Hyperproof by eight and Diligent One Platform carries 20 labels and Hyperproof 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%12%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels2016A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Diligent One Platform reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.FloQast was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. AuditBoard vs Diligent One Platform · AuditBoard vs Hyperproof · FloQast vs Diligent One Platform
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Internal controls and SOX page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Diligent One PlatformFirst choices, of twelve modelsHyperproof
Direct00
Paraphrase221 against Diligent One Platform
Comparative10
Budget-constrained002 against Hyperproof
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Diligent One Platform and Hyperproof stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Diligent One Platform Hyperproof first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Diligent One Platform on the left and Hyperproof on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Diligent One Platform and Hyperproof stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashOptro alternatives: FloQast, Hyperproof, Scytale, Workiva
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Hyperproof, Onspring, Workiva
Qwen 3.7 FlashOnspring alternatives: Hyperproof, Scytale
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuditBoard, FloQast alternatives: Hyperproof, Mitti, NAVEX One, Workiva
MiniMax M2.5FloQast alternatives: Diligent One Platform, Optro, VComply
Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5AuditBoard alternatives: FloQast, Optro, Scytale
GPT-5.4 miniWorkiva alternatives: AuditBoard, LogicGate Risk Cloud
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Optro
Grok 4.1 FastFloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Onspring, VComply
Mistral SmallFloQast alternatives: HighRadius, Optro
Llama 4 MaverickFloQast alternatives: HighRadius, Onspring
Kimi K2FloQast alternatives: AuditBoard, Onspring, Workiva
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Hyperproof leads by ten points.
Hyperproof10%#2 of 13Diligent One Platform0%#– of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Diligent One Platform4%#3 of 13Hyperproof4%#5 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Diligent One Platform0%#9 of 11Hyperproof0%#– of 11What the models said about Diligent One Platform
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“It is expensive (often $180k–$350k/year for mid-market packages) and has a steeper learning curve. It is likely overkill” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with HighBond or AuditBoard as they offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“HighBond is praised for ongoing evidence collection and clear exception follow-through, making them both strong choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose HighBond if you need strong SOX compliance with traceable evidence” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Hyperproof
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“quote-based platforms (e.g., Drata ~$7.5K-$25K/year, Hyperproof $12K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Hyperproof: ~$41,000/year ... you should avoid them” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Hyperproof is the best balance of cost, ease of use, and feature depth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LogicGate or Hyperproof are the strongest value picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If the IT Security / Engineering team owns ITGCs and you also need SOC 2: Go with Hyperproof or Scytale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
AuditBoard vs Diligent One PlatformAuditBoard vs HyperproofFloQast vs Diligent One PlatformFloQast vs HyperproofDiligent One Platform vs LogicGate Risk CloudDiligent One Platform vs OptroDiligent One Platform vs WorkivaDiligent One Platform vs OnspringLogicGate Risk Cloud vs HyperproofHyperproof vs OptroHyperproof vs WorkivaHyperproof vs OnspringAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full internal controls standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.