Every category where a model named Hyperproof for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	4%	7 of 71	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hyperproof yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hyperproof across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels1

Paraphrase12 labels5

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a mid-sized B2B company, Hyperproof is the best balance of cost, ease of use, and feature depth.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“LogicGate or Hyperproof are the strongest value picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If the IT Security / Engineering team owns ITGCs and you also need SOC 2: Go with Hyperproof or Scytale.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · direct prompt · alternative

“Repeatable control testing at scale | Automated control testing with auditable evidence” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“quote-based platforms (e.g., Drata ~$7.5K-$25K/year, Hyperproof $12K+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Internal controls · budget prompt · soft negative

“Hyperproof: ~$41,000/year ... you should avoid them” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hyperproof, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hyperproof was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta24 of 446Not in the top three

Drata22 of 445Not in the top three

AuditBoard21 of 443Not in the top three

Workiva19 of 440Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud15 of 441Not in the top three

Onspring13 of 443Not in the top three

MetricStream13 of 441Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management13 of 440Not in the top three

Archer12 of 441Not in the top three

FloQast10 of 445Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hyperproof. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 44 answers that named Hyperproof and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

optro.ai29

worldmetrics.org28

gitnux.org26

gartner.com19

netwrix.com18

riskpublishing.com15

sprinto.com14

checkthat.ai12

zipdo.co12

highradius.com11

184 of the 184 domain citations in answers naming Hyperproof came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software19

optro.ai/blog/best-internal-control-management-software19

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software18

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-management-software17

worldmetrics.org/best/internal-control-management-software16

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-software14

riskpublishing.com/best-sox-compliance-software-compared14

optro.ai/blog/best-sox-management-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hyperproof's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hyperproof, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hyperproof.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.