Index › Vendors › Bob Finance · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Bob Finance

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Bob Finance was named 3 times in FP&A platforms and 1 other category, where Vena led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market23 of 52

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In fp&a platforms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bob Finance for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	23 of 52	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	38 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bob Finance yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bob Finance across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your business is driven by headcount, hiring pacing, and personnel costs: Go with Bob Finance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · alternative

“Alternative: Bob Finance (formerly Mosaic Tech)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial modeling · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for: VC-backed tech/SaaS startups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bob Finance, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bob Finance was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cube3 of 31Not in the top three

Anaplan3 of 30Not in the top three

Pigment3 of 30Not in the top three

Planful3 of 30Not in the top three

Vena3 of 30Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning2 of 30Not in the top three

Drivetrain1 of 31Not in the top three

Runway1 of 31Not in the top three

Clockwork1 of 30Not in the top three

Datarails1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Bob Finance

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bob Finance; a claim can dispute any of them.

Bob Finance (formerly Mosaic) 1HiBob Finance (formerly Mosaic) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bob Finance's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bob Finance, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.