6 categories · RankedJirav
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP&A platforms | Planning and analysis | 2% | 12 of 52 | 15% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Financial modeling and scenario planning | Planning and analysis | 0% | 19 of 114 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19% |
| Financial reporting and dashboards | Planning and analysis | 0% | 36 of 133 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27% |
| Board and investor reporting | Planning and analysis | 0% | 38 of 97 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25% |
| Cash flow forecasting | Treasury and cash | 0% | 69 of 86 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18% |
| Corporate performance management | Planning and analysis | 0% | 26 of 95 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd choose Jirav for the best balance of affordability and full FP&A functionality for small businesses.” Perplexity Sonar · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have a finance person and a budget of $5,000+/year for deep, custom financial modeling: Go with Jirav.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · alternative
“For companies in the lower-mid-market range ($5M to $30M ARR) ... Jirav is highly recommended.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Board · direct prompt · alternative
“Vena, Pigment, Jirav, Centage, Prophix, Datarails \u2014 good governance + Excel familiarity” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial modeling · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier ones like Jirav (~$10K/year)” Grok 4.1 Fast · FP&A platforms · budget prompt · hard negative
“cautious about using standard Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A) platforms (like Anaplan, Jirav, or even some ERP modules)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative
“it hits ceilings at true mid-market complexity — multi-entity consolidation and custom integrations require workarounds” Claude Haiku 4.5 · FP&A platforms · direct prompt · soft negative
“you don't need a massive enterprise platform (like Vena or Jirav, which can cost hundreds of dollars a month)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 138 answers that named Jirav and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
403 of the 403 domain citations in answers naming Jirav came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jirav's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jirav, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jirav.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.