Every category where a model named Calero-MDSL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Telecom expense management	Spend and procurement	0%	67 of 89	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Calero-MDSL yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Calero-MDSL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Calero-MDSL (Best for Wireless)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Calero merging with MDSL and acquiring Comview” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Calero-MDSL, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Calero-MDSL was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tangoe One Telecom15 of 184Not among the top eight

Sakon12 of 180Not among the top eight

Brightfin8 of 180Not among the top eight

Genuity7 of 182Not among the top eight

vCom Solutions5 of 181Not among the top eight

Cass Information Systems5 of 180Not among the top eight

Lightyear4 of 181Not among the top eight

Upland Cimpl4 of 181Not among the top eight

Tellennium4 of 180Not among the top eight

Vigilis3 of 181Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Calero-MDSL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named Calero-MDSL and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

use.expensify.com13

sociumit.com11

gartner.com9

uplandsoftware.com9

lightyear.ai8

mindglobal.com7

paylinedata.com6

tailwindvoiceanddata.com6

thectoclub.com6

worldmetrics.org6

No domain is on file for Calero-MDSL, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/telecom-expense-management-solutions13

sociumit.com/resources/blog/best-telecom-expense-management-software-20269

uplandsoftware.com/cimpl/technology-expense-management/best-telecom-expense-management-sof8

lightyear.ai/blogs/best-telecom-expense-management-software7

gartner.com/reviews/market/telecom-expense-management-services-global6

paylinedata.com/blog/telecom-expense-management-software6

tailwindvoiceanddata.com/blog/the-7-best-telecom-expense-management-companies-in-20266

thectoclub.com/tools/best-telecom-expense-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Calero-MDSL stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“calero-mdsl”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 67 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt

Segment leader

19%

Genuity

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Calero-MDSL

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calero-MDSL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calero-MDSL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Calero-MDSL by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Calero-MDSL is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Calero-MDSL, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.