AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Tellennium · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Tellennium

20Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Tellennium was named 8 times in Telecom expense mgmt, where Genuity led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tellennium for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telecom expense managementSpend and procurement2%13 of 8912%8under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tellennium yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tellennium across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash10012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“vCom Solutions / Tellennium / Mindglobal: Highly regarded for providing a strong managed service layer specifically tailored to mid-market organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · scale prompt · first choice
“Focus on recurring expense operations, invoice processing, AP workflows, and payments” Kimi K2 · Telecom expense mgmt · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Multi-Site Operations” Kimi K2 · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tellennium: Joined the NetSpark IP & Telecom family.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tellennium, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tellennium was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tangoe One Telecom14 of 203Not among the top eight
Calero13 of 201Not among the top eight
Lightyear10 of 203Not among the top eight
Brightfin9 of 200Not among the top eight
Sakon8 of 200Not among the top eight
DMI6 of 200Not among the top eight
Upland Cimpl5 of 201Not among the top eight
vCom Solutions5 of 201Not among the top eight
Calero-MDSL4 of 200Not among the top eight
Cass Information Systems4 of 200Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tellennium. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Tellennium and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

tellennium.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Tellennium takes 2% of first choices and Genuity takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “telecom expense management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “telecom expense management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“tellennium”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 709 a month
Searches its site ranks for
255 · 19 in the top three
Sites linking to it
626
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
25 ads · 15 text, 6 video, 4 image · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Tellennium, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year, 18 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 13 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt
Segment leader
19%
Genuity
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on tellennium.com
442
subdomains included
Content
401
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog362122026-09-29Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Case study1602024-11-19Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Comparison922026-09-30Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Glossary or explainer402025-01-30Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Report or ebook3undated
Conference or event202018-12-19
News or press202019-10-16
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Template or tool102025-10-13
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page tellennium.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (69); 28 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Tellennium

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tellennium; a claim can dispute any of them.
Tellennium (Management of Things®/MoT®) 1

Follow Tellennium

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Tellennium is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise Expense Management
For
the enterprise market
Customers named
Steel ManufacturerFortune 500 ManufacturerHealth Care ProviderHealthcare SystemGlobal law firmHospitalityFinancial SystemConstruction Management
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Tellennium's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: tellennium.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tellennium's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tellennium, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tellennium by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Tellennium is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tellennium, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tellennium.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.