Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Checkout.com · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Checkout.com

24Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Checkout.com was named 6 times in B2B payment acceptance and 1 other category, where Helcim led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business60 of 66

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 91

under the label threshold

Enterprise61 of 88

under the label threshold

In b2b payment acceptance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Checkout.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	24 of 91	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	46 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Checkout.com yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Checkout.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if you're more internationally oriented and care about multi-region card acceptance” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · alternative

“I would prioritize platforms like Stripe Treasury/Connect, Checkout.com” Qwen 3.7 Flash · B2B payment acceptance · scale prompt · alternative

“API-driven card and digital payment processing, tuned for scaling merchants.” Perplexity Sonar · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · alternative

“Global scale, strong fraud protection” MiniMax M2.5 · B2B payment acceptance · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reviews suggest extreme reliability concerns: Arbitrary terminations” Kimi K2 · B2B payment acceptance · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Checkout.com, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Checkout.com was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Stripe19 of 244Not in the top three

Adyen17 of 245Not in the top three

Airwallex16 of 242Not in the top three

Wise Business11 of 242Not in the top three

Thunes9 of 243Not in the top three

BILL8 of 241Not in the top three

Payoneer8 of 240Not in the top three

Currencycloud7 of 240Not in the top three

Nium6 of 240Not in the top three

Corpay Cross-Border5 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Checkout.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 24 answers that named Checkout.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

connectpay.com16

highradius.com14

worldmetrics.org13

airwallex.com12

adyen.com6

gartner.com6

thebossmagazine.com6

dashdevs.com5

freysoft.com5

stripe.com5

Eighty-eight of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming Checkout.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

connectpay.com/blog/cross-border-payments-companies9

connectpay.com/blog/b2b-payment-platforms8

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cross-border-payment-platforms8

airwallex.com/en-uk/blog/enterprise-global-payment-solutions6

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/cross-border-payment-services-solutions6

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms6

worldmetrics.org/service/b2b-payment6

dashdevs.com/blog/top-cross-border-payments-companies5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Checkout.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Checkout.com; a claim can dispute any of them.

checkout.com 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Checkout.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Checkout.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkout.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.